1993
DOI: 10.1016/0090-4295(93)90364-g
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of variation in prostate-specific antigen values

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
29
1
1

Year Published

1996
1996
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
29
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In 80% of the patients the variations were in the range of -1.0 to +1.2 ng/ml. Reihmann et al [15] found a mean coefficient of variation of serum PSA concentration of 58% in a group of 39 patients without cancer in whom 3 or more assays were performed in a period of over 1 year.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 80% of the patients the variations were in the range of -1.0 to +1.2 ng/ml. Reihmann et al [15] found a mean coefficient of variation of serum PSA concentration of 58% in a group of 39 patients without cancer in whom 3 or more assays were performed in a period of over 1 year.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We subsequently back-calculated the CV b by subtracting CV a from CV t : CV b ϭ ͌ CV t 2 Ϫ CV a 2 (7 ). Fifteen studies reported considerable variability of serial tPSA concentrations, but it was impossible to derive the CV b because of sufficient information on CV t and CV a was lacking (33)(34)(35)(36)(37)(38)(39)(40)(41)(42)(43)(44)(45)(46)(47).…”
Section: Biological Variation Estimatesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8 Riehmann et al reported 39 subjects without prostate cancer in which PSA was measured more than three times during an average measurement interval of 10.3 months, and the biological variation was 55%, which was approximately fourfold higher than the 13% on interassay variation. 9 These results demonstrated that the rapid PSA fluctuations were due to various physiological conditions and the existence of benign prostatic diseases, and were not due to prostate cancer. It is necessary to optimize the calculation method, measurement interval, and cut-off value of PSAV to distinguish the PSA rise due to prostate cancer tissue from that due to the physiological fluctuation of PSA.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 71%