2002
DOI: 10.1029/2000jc000578
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of velocity field in the eastern Black Sea from satellite data during the Black Sea '99 experiment

Abstract: Maximum cross correlation (MCC) analysis of National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) advanced very high resolution radiometer (AVHRR) imagery of the eastern Black Sea in late September 1999 has been used to reconstruct the velocity and vorticity fields of the upper layer of the sea. Analysis revealed the large‐scale dynamic features characteristic of the Black Sea, namely the Rim Current, as well as the detailed pattern of mesoscale vortical activity including meanders, eddies, and dipoles, which… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
23
0
2

Year Published

2005
2005
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
3
23
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…(26) withĊ = 0. In general, the resulting velocity field is sparse and is postprocessed to retrieve a smoother field (e.g., Afanasyev et al, 2002) or it is combined with altimetric measurements (e.g., Abraham, 1998;Wilkin et al, 2002). Notice that the MCC approach requires high-resolution data such as the observations provided by infrared and visible radiometers (resolutions ∼ 1 km) but the resulting velocity field has spatial resolutions on the order of the window used to track features (∼ 20 km, e.g., Bowen et al, 2002).…”
Section: Currents From a Sequence Of Tracer Imagesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(26) withĊ = 0. In general, the resulting velocity field is sparse and is postprocessed to retrieve a smoother field (e.g., Afanasyev et al, 2002) or it is combined with altimetric measurements (e.g., Abraham, 1998;Wilkin et al, 2002). Notice that the MCC approach requires high-resolution data such as the observations provided by infrared and visible radiometers (resolutions ∼ 1 km) but the resulting velocity field has spatial resolutions on the order of the window used to track features (∼ 20 km, e.g., Bowen et al, 2002).…”
Section: Currents From a Sequence Of Tracer Imagesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As stated before, direct measurements of surface currents by satellites remain quite limited. This situation has prompted the development of various indirect methods, either by assuming dynamical constraints to sea surface temperature (SST) images (Kelly, 1989;Vigan et al, 2000b;Chen et al, 2008) by applying pattern recognition techniques as neural networks (Côté and Tatnall, 1997) or the maximum cross-correlation (MCC) technique Afanasyev et al, 2002;Dransfeld et al, 2006). A better understanding of the dynamics in the upper layers of the ocean has allowed the proposal of a new framework based on the surface quasi-geostrophic (SQG) equations (Held et al, 1995;Lapeyre and Klein, 2006), which is able to retrieve sea surface currents from a single SST image (LaCasce and Mahadevan, 2006;Isern-Fontanet et al, 2006a;.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Fedorov (1986), the dipole is one of the most widespread forms of non-stationary and non-linear motion in the ocean. Many studies reported observations of surface layer dipolar structures using remote sensing methods (e.g., Ginzburg et al, 2002;Afansyev et al, 2002) and the important contribution of these dipoles to the coastal/deep-basin water exchange was recognized. Due to their high drift speed, the dipoles are able to advect properties very efficiently.…”
Section: N Serra Et Al: Surface Expression Of Mw Dipolesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Modern algorithms are complex, sometimes combining several approaches or in situ measurements, e.g., [52,56]. In the Black Sea region, MCC and optical flow methods were used in [46,48,57,58].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sequences of time-ordered images allow for the estimation of two-dimensional image motion as either instantaneous image velocities or discrete image displacements. Primary approaches to estimating velocity fields from image sequences can be divided into two groups [38]: differential methods, which are mostly based on heat or optical flow equations inversion [39][40][41][42][43][44], and the Maximum Cross Correlation (MCC) technique [45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54][55]. Modern algorithms are complex, sometimes combining several approaches or in situ measurements, e.g., [52,56].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%