2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.compag.2021.106267
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of visual features and classifiers for Fruit classification problem

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…SE block only recalibrates channel-wise feature responses and enhances the network's attention to important channels. For the spatial distribution inside the feature map, the SE block does not make further processing; however, some subtle differences in fruit images may be reflected in the spatial dimension, such as the subtle texture and contour differences of different types of fruits [82]. Hence, it is necessary to add a spatial attention mechanism to the network.…”
Section: Lightweight Attention Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SE block only recalibrates channel-wise feature responses and enhances the network's attention to important channels. For the spatial distribution inside the feature map, the SE block does not make further processing; however, some subtle differences in fruit images may be reflected in the spatial dimension, such as the subtle texture and contour differences of different types of fruits [82]. Hence, it is necessary to add a spatial attention mechanism to the network.…”
Section: Lightweight Attention Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some popular classifiers, including K-nearest neighbor (KNN), random forest (RF), artificial neural network (ANN), and SVM, were used for different kinds of tea quality identification and achieved excellent results [4][5][6]. It is known that achieving accurate identification also relies on effective hand-designed features, such as color, texture, and shape [7,8]. However, different qualities of tea tend to have minor differences in appearance, resulting in low identification accuracy of hand-designed features combined with classical machine learning methods [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fig 8. The precision values of every single class for multiclass TrAdaBoost with different base learners…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Computer vision can be used for analyzing an image, specifically identifying the quality of the fruit [2][3][4]. Instead of using human eyes to observe the fruit color, the computer can process an image and classify fruit quality by using certain algorithms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%