2019 IEEE Global Communications Conference (GLOBECOM) 2019
DOI: 10.1109/globecom38437.2019.9013615
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of Worst-Case Interference in Underlay Radar-Massive MIMO Spectrum Sharing Scenarios

Abstract: In this paper, we consider an underlay radarmassive MIMO spectrum sharing scenario in which massive MIMO base stations (BSs) are allowed to operate outside a circular exclusion zone centered at the radar. Modeling the locations of the massive MIMO BSs as a homogeneous Poisson point process (PPP), we derive an analytical expression for a tight upper bound on the average interference at the radar due to cellular transmissions. The technical novelty is in bounding the worst-case elevation angle for each massive M… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, by considering the sensitivity of the radar system, the wireless communication signal may deteriorate the radar detection performance, as emphasized by [ 13 ]. In works conducted by [ 14 ], it was revealed that an average intersystem interfence at the radar system that goes from commercial base stations can be presented mathematically with a zone of exclusion. The commercial base stations’ communications systems are assumed to be equipped with many antennas, and the locations of cellular base stations are analyzed as a Poisson point process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, by considering the sensitivity of the radar system, the wireless communication signal may deteriorate the radar detection performance, as emphasized by [ 13 ]. In works conducted by [ 14 ], it was revealed that an average intersystem interfence at the radar system that goes from commercial base stations can be presented mathematically with a zone of exclusion. The commercial base stations’ communications systems are assumed to be equipped with many antennas, and the locations of cellular base stations are analyzed as a Poisson point process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different from spectrum sharing in communication-communication systems, in spectrum sharing in radar-communication systems, inter-system interference (ISI) has to be carefully managed because of sensitivity of radar and tremendously high transmit power of radar compared to communication system [ 20 ]. Recently, a few groups have drawn several research results on the spectrum sharing technologies between radar and communication systems [ 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 ]. The most challenging technical issue when both the radar and communication systems share the same spectrum band is obviously the inter-system interference to each other, which may significantly degrade the performance of both systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the reverse direction ISI from the cellular communication system to the radar system was also not considered in [ 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 ], even though the sensitivity of the radar system is very high and the wireless communication signal may deteriorate the radar detection performance severely [ 20 ]. In [ 25 ], an average ISI at the radar system from the cellular BSs was mathematically analyzed with exclusion zone, where cellular BSs are assumed to be equipped with a massive number of antennas and the locations of cellular BSs are modeled as a Poisson point process (PPP). In [ 26 ], a chance-constrained stochastic optimization technique was proposed to guarantee the minimum performance of the radar system, while maximizing the performance of cellular system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where propagation is dominated by the LoS component1 . In addition, the random small-scale fading amplitude satisfies E[γ i ] = 0 and E[|γ i | 2 ] = 1.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%