2009
DOI: 10.1142/s0218348x09004156
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis on a Fractal Set

Abstract: The formulation of a new analysis on a zero measure Cantor set C(⊂ I = [0, 1]) is presented. A non-Archimedean absolute value is introduced in C exploiting the concept of relative infinitesimals and a scale invariant ultrametric valuation of the form log ε −1 (ε/x) for a given scale ε > 0 and infinitesimals 0 < x < ε, x ∈ I\C. Using this new absolute value, a valued (metric) measure is defined on C and is shown to be equal to the finite Hausdorff measure of the set, if it exists. The formulation of a scale inv… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
50
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
50
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Choosing the full set C for E and noting that s is the Hausdorff dimension it thus follows that µ v (C) = 1. We remark that the metric properties of the present ultrametric are indeed distinct from the natural ultrametric (c.f., [4,5]), since the Lebesgue measure of C in the natural ultrametric is zero, but in the present case, the corresponding valued measure equals the Hausdorff measure. More importantly, topologies induced by the two ultrametrics are also different, as seen in the following example.…”
Section: Valued Measurementioning
confidence: 75%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Choosing the full set C for E and noting that s is the Hausdorff dimension it thus follows that µ v (C) = 1. We remark that the metric properties of the present ultrametric are indeed distinct from the natural ultrametric (c.f., [4,5]), since the Lebesgue measure of C in the natural ultrametric is zero, but in the present case, the corresponding valued measure equals the Hausdorff measure. More importantly, topologies induced by the two ultrametrics are also different, as seen in the following example.…”
Section: Valued Measurementioning
confidence: 75%
“…Some of the results presented here are new (Theorem 1 and Proposition 2): (i) The relation of the nontrivial valuation with the Cantor function, considered in Refs. [4,5], is made precise by proving that the valuation is indeed given by an appropriate Cantor function. (ii) The multiplicative representation that exists because of the nontrivial infinitesimals and the scale invariant ultrametric for every element of the Cantor set is verified explicitly, leading to a proof that the non-archimedean absolute value ||x|| = 3 −ns , x ∈ C, s = log 3 2 precisely corresponds to the ultrametric of [2] in the context of noncommutative geometry and (iii) the analysis of convergence of sequences of the form ǫ n−nl , 0 < ǫ, l < 1.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An ordinary real x is extended over to the fattened variables x of a Cantor set is replaced by a connected segment over which the real variable x (with a slight abuse of notation, we are here using the same symbol which denoted infinitesimals in 0 ) is supposed to live in [8,9].…”
Section: Deformed Real Number Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Let us consider the simplest differential equation 1 = dt dx (8) This may be assumed to represent the uniform motion (of the centre of mass) of a rigid ball. Accordingly, the ball will roll at uniform rate 1 along the x -axis when the position at any instance may, for To summarize, the extension of the singleton set of the form {0} of R over to a deleted set of the form {0} \ 1,1) ( is realized explicitly in the context of the linear equation (8).…”
Section: First Order Equationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation