2016
DOI: 10.1109/tasc.2016.2539976
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis on Magnetizing Characteristics Due to Peak Fault Current Limiting Operation of a Modified Flux-Lock-Type SFCL With Two Magnetic Paths

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Small in size and less weight. [36,37] Cost As the required inductor and resistor are superconducting nature, it has high implantation cost.…”
Section: Items Superconducting Fcl Non-superconducting Fcl Referencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Small in size and less weight. [36,37] Cost As the required inductor and resistor are superconducting nature, it has high implantation cost.…”
Section: Items Superconducting Fcl Non-superconducting Fcl Referencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among several of the SFCLs, the flux-lock type SFCL has less power burden of the high temperature superconducting (HTSC) element [53]. Short circuit current in power system can be limited with the flux-lock type fault current limiter during different contingencies [36,41,53,[84][85][86][87][88]. The configuration of the flux-lock type SFCL with over current relay is shown in the Figure 7 where N 1 , N 2 , N 3 and i 1 , i 2 , i 3 represent coil-1, coil-2 and coil-3 and their currents, respectively.…”
Section: Flux-lock Type Sfclmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is because such a function can be provided by changing from a zero resistance to a high normal resistance when the critical current, critical temperature, and critical magnetic field are exceeded. For this reason, numerous SFCLs have been proposed in the past few years [3][4][5][6]. SFCL technology with high-efficiency and high-compression design was introduced almost 50 years ago [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To date, VSC-HVDC system stability has been examined with the implementation of different categories of superconducting FCLs (SFCLs) [1,9,31,32]. However, superconducting fault current limiters have several drawbacks such as big size, heavy weight and cost, magnetic field interference with nearby sensitive devices, higher leakage and circulating currents, long recovery time, and loss in stand-by mode [33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40] compared to non-superconducting fault current limiters. Non-superconducting variable resistive bridge type fault current limiters (VR-BFCLs) could restrict the fault current as well as improve transient stability with low cost, loss and voltage drop [24,28,41,42].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%