2010
DOI: 10.3724/sp.j.1142.2010.40466
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis on the Population Genetic Diversity of an Endangered Plant (<I>Elaeagnus mollis</I>) by SSR Markers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
10
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The Nei's gene diversity index always was regarded as one parameter to estimate the genetic differentiation of plant populations (Qin et al, 2010). The average gene diversity (H S ) was 0.2840 within populations of Q. liaotungensis.…”
Section: Genetic Structure Of Q Liaotungensis Populationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Nei's gene diversity index always was regarded as one parameter to estimate the genetic differentiation of plant populations (Qin et al, 2010). The average gene diversity (H S ) was 0.2840 within populations of Q. liaotungensis.…”
Section: Genetic Structure Of Q Liaotungensis Populationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this species, the total genetic diversity (Ht) and intraspecies genetic diversity (Hs) were 0.1706 and 0.1149 respectively. Compared to the endangered plant E. mollis in previous RAPD-(Ht=0.359, Hs=0.302) and SSR-based (Ht=0.3173, Hs=0.2575) studies (Qin et al, 2006;Qin et al, 2010), E. macrophylla in the present study showed lower diversity. Similarly, the diversity values in the present study are lower than those estimated using ISSR markers for the coastal and island plants Ilex integra (Ht=0.223, Hs=0.153;Leng et al, 2005), Machilus thunbergii (Ht=0.269, Hs=0.186;Leng et al (2006), and Sonneratia caseolari (Ht=0.2103, Hs=0.1468Li et al (2004)) but higher than those reported for Neolitsea sericea (Ht=0.1248, Hs=0.0793; (Wang et al, 2004).…”
Section: Genetic Diversity and Genetic Differentiation Of E Macrophyllacontrasting
confidence: 73%
“…The eco-environmental characteristics of E. mollis are typically efficient heat energy, little annual rainfall, and poor stands Zhang et al, 2001). Recent habitat fragmentation has affected all E. mollis populations by reducing their size and increasing their isolation (Qin et al, 2006(Qin et al, , 2010.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The endangered status of E. mollis may not be related to low genetic diversity but instead to the specific breeding system of the species, as well as ecological factors (Qin et al, 2006(Qin et al, , 2010Xu et al, 2011). The endangered status of E. mollis may also be caused by strong artificial interference.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%