2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.ultramic.2017.01.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis the effect of different geometries of AFM's cantilever on the dynamic behavior and the critical forces of three-dimensional manipulation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In fact, the spring constant (k) can only be recognized as fixed value in a very narrow range of operation. The nonlinear characteristics of the triangular AFM cantilevers has been described earlier by Korayem et al 60 . Computer generated virtual cantilever models confirm the behavior of V-shape probes observed here.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In fact, the spring constant (k) can only be recognized as fixed value in a very narrow range of operation. The nonlinear characteristics of the triangular AFM cantilevers has been described earlier by Korayem et al 60 . Computer generated virtual cantilever models confirm the behavior of V-shape probes observed here.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Young's Modulus) and its distribution on the probe are usually undefined, but severely influencing the characteristics of the system. Even the location of the tip on the cantilever (the distance of the tip from the cantilever end) is known to affect the cantilever stiffness 60 . The imprecise attachment of colloidal particle introduces significant contribution to the cantilever stiffness because of the particle mass.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The lateral signal of a position-sensitive detector was acquired with Data Acquisition Card for the tip pushing samples. Moreover, the frictional force between the CNTs and the Si substrate was calculated [24,26,31] to 17 ± 2 nN for the AFM tip pushing distance from 100 nm to 1 um.…”
Section: Afm Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, scanning-manipulating-scanning reduces efficiency and effectiveness, which hinders AFM tip manipulation [ 20 , 21 ]. Thus, some researchers have developed feedback systems based on the manipulating forces concerning technical difficulties [ 22 , 23 , 24 ], such as the augmented reality system [ 25 , 26 , 27 ], which could monitor real-time changes of the nanoenvironment during the manipulating process by analyzing the interaction forces among the tip, substrate, and manipulating target. Some AFM tip control algorithms and drift-compensation methods were also used to push nanoparticles or nanorods [ 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%