1997
DOI: 10.2307/2951814
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analytic Homomorphisms into Drinfeld Modules

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
72
0
2

Year Published

1999
1999
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
3
72
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In that case, we can apply Yu's Kolchin-type result [27], Thm. 1.3, to conclude that, for some fixed i, there are non-zero endomorphisms Θ ℓ ∈ End(H i ), ℓ = 1, .…”
Section: Proofs Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In that case, we can apply Yu's Kolchin-type result [27], Thm. 1.3, to conclude that, for some fixed i, there are non-zero endomorphisms Θ ℓ ∈ End(H i ), ℓ = 1, .…”
Section: Proofs Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Seen on a large enough scale, the proofs here and in [24] also run somewhat parallel, based as they are on J. Yu's Theorem of the Sub-t-module [27], reproduced below as Theorem 5.1.1, and G. Wüstholz's Theorem of the Subgroup [25], respectively. Luckily, as stated above, the theory of bracket relations even provides the analogue of the Deligne-Koblitz-Ogus characterization for the algebraicity of the product of values of the (normalized) classical Gamma function at rational points predicted by the classical relations.…”
Section: Dependence Of Gamma Valuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Indeed, any tensor power C ⊗m , for any power m ∈ N \ {0}, of the Carlitz module C is always a simple, abelian (see [13], Corollary 5.9.38) and uniformizable T −module (see [31], Proposition 1.2), but one can prove that it possesses sometimes (as in the present case) nontrivial sub-T j −modules for some j depending on m and q. By choosing 0 × G a as an algebraic subvariety of C ⊗2 , we now see that it contains infinitely many torsion points, which correspond, by Proposition 1.14 and discussion subsequent to Remark 1.17, to the F 2 (T 2 )−rational points of the torsion part of:…”
Section: A New Conjecturementioning
confidence: 99%