2003
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.67.094107
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analytic model of the shear modulus at all temperatures and densities

Abstract: An analytic model of the shear modulus applicable at temperatures up to melt and at all densities is presented. It is based in part on a relation between the melting temperature and the shear modulus at melt. Experimental data on argon are shown to agree with this relation to within 1%. The model of the shear modulus involves seven parameters, all of which can be determined from zero-pressure experimental data. We obtain the values of these parameters for 11 elemental solids. Both the experimental data on the … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
61
1
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 98 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 77 publications
6
61
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This relation is in fair agreement with the Murnaghan equation, broadly used is earth sciences (Murnaghan, 1944;Poirier, 2000;Skripov and Faizulin, 2006) 1/3)), i.e., it differs from Burakovsky (Burakovsky et al, 2003) predictions. Kumari and Dass (Kumari and Dass, 1988;Dass, 1995) also applied the framework of the Lindemann criterion (Lindemann, 1910) and workout the relation originally focused on the pressure evolution of the melting temperature, focusing on alkali metals:…”
Section: Parameterization Of the Pressure Evolution Of Melting And Glsupporting
confidence: 65%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This relation is in fair agreement with the Murnaghan equation, broadly used is earth sciences (Murnaghan, 1944;Poirier, 2000;Skripov and Faizulin, 2006) 1/3)), i.e., it differs from Burakovsky (Burakovsky et al, 2003) predictions. Kumari and Dass (Kumari and Dass, 1988;Dass, 1995) also applied the framework of the Lindemann criterion (Lindemann, 1910) and workout the relation originally focused on the pressure evolution of the melting temperature, focusing on alkali metals:…”
Section: Parameterization Of the Pressure Evolution Of Melting And Glsupporting
confidence: 65%
“…9, most often recalled as the "Kechin equation, " became the key tool for describing experimental data associated with melting curve maximum (Drozd-Rzoska, 2005;Skripov and Faizulin, 2006;Drozd-Rzoska et al, 2007a;Rzoska and Mazur, 2007;Rzoska et al, 2010). Regarding the meaning of parameters in Eqs 6-9 one can generalize the reasoning of Burakovsky et al (Burakowsky et al, 2000;Burakovsky et al, 2003), who considered the volume-related compression factor (modulus):…”
Section: Parameterization Of the Pressure Evolution Of Melting And Glmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, for bulk Cu, a temperature increase of 200°C leads to a 20 GPa decrease in modulus. 24 Elastic modulus temperature data for bulk Cu and Au 25,26 is also presented in Table I, for comparison. Although not originally expected, the thermal drift-corrected elastic-modulus data in Table I shows that the temperature effect is more pronounced for nanocrystalline Au and Cu thin films, compared to the bulk Au and Cu.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following PK, who restricted their model to but two possible molecular orientations, separated by a suitable energy barrier (for n orientations with n > 2, see ref [5]) we summarize using the notation employed in the book by Ubbelohde [7], the phenomenological equations for the two order parameters Q and S, namely Though in ref [1], modest contact was established with solid H 2 and the halogens, it has subsequently come to the author's attention that very relevant proton magnetic resonance (PMR) experiments are recorded in the older literature for the solid tetramethyls already referred to. We refer here especially to the study [8] [16] and Burakovsky and co-workers [17,18]. Here we shall report on the subsequent study of Matthai and March [19] who have emphasized especially the common features shared by the treatments of KJ and Burakovsky et al…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Combining this relation (A5.1) with the melting criterion of Lindemann [16], one is led to the relation (see also [18])…”
Section: Appendix 32mentioning
confidence: 99%