2017
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)st.1943-541x.0001733
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analytical and Experimental Lateral-Load Response of Self-Centering Posttensioned CLT Walls

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
25
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
1
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The second type uses fiber-discretized elements or distributed springs to simulate the rocking interface while extending the wall to the actual width (in order to simulate rocking moment lever arm) with simple rigid elements. [13][14][15] There are other simplified models such as Sandoli et al 16 where rigid body rocking of the rocking panels is assumed. But when high aspect ratio rocking panels are present, which will have significant elastic deformations and higher-mode responses, rigid body panel models could not capture dynamic deformation of the panel itself.…”
Section: F I G U R E 1 Kinematics Configuration Of the Simplified Rocking Wall Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The second type uses fiber-discretized elements or distributed springs to simulate the rocking interface while extending the wall to the actual width (in order to simulate rocking moment lever arm) with simple rigid elements. [13][14][15] There are other simplified models such as Sandoli et al 16 where rigid body rocking of the rocking panels is assumed. But when high aspect ratio rocking panels are present, which will have significant elastic deformations and higher-mode responses, rigid body panel models could not capture dynamic deformation of the panel itself.…”
Section: F I G U R E 1 Kinematics Configuration Of the Simplified Rocking Wall Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These models can be quite accurate but also computationally expensive. The second type uses fiber‐discretized elements or distributed springs to simulate the rocking interface while extending the wall to the actual width (in order to simulate rocking moment lever arm) with simple rigid elements 13–15 . There are other simplified models such as Sandoli et al 16 where rigid body rocking of the rocking panels is assumed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The success of the system inspired component tests implementing CLT instead of LVL, with the specific intention of improving the ductility of contemporary lateral force-resisting systems in CLT buildings (Ganey et al 2017). Akbas et al (2017) derived model parameters from the experimental test data of Ganey et al (2017). These results were then used to design a full-scale shake table test of a two-story CLT building with posttensioned rocking walls.…”
Section: Time-to-functionality Fragility Curvesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies have been conducted to analyze the recentering and dissipative characteristics of structures made with this technology (Akbas et al, 2017;Ganey et al, 2017;Hashemi et al, 2020). As well as the dissipative effects due to the insertion of rocking elements inside existing structures to be entrusted with the migration of damage (Pilon et al, 2019;Sandoli et al, 2020;, or due to the presence of metal connections for reinforcement interventions in its plane with CLT panels (Longarini et al, 2018) or off-plan (Riccadonna et al, 2019).…”
Section: Parasite Architecture: Structural Aspectsmentioning
confidence: 99%