2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2013.12.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analytical and numerical DDA analysis on the collapse mode of circular masonry arches

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
29
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
2
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…• non-dimensional horizontal thrust h = H/(w r ) acting in such a limit state of minimum thickness still available to sustain the arch (Couplet-Heyman problem). This classical least-thickness problem in the statics of masonry arches has been revisited by the present authors within a wide research project that has been considering different characteristic aspects, by employing both self-consistent analytical and numerical techniques [5][6][7][8][9][10]. Arches of a general half-angle of embrace 0 <  <  (including for undercomplete and over-complete, horseshoe circular masonry arches) have been systematically analysed in analytical terms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…• non-dimensional horizontal thrust h = H/(w r ) acting in such a limit state of minimum thickness still available to sustain the arch (Couplet-Heyman problem). This classical least-thickness problem in the statics of masonry arches has been revisited by the present authors within a wide research project that has been considering different characteristic aspects, by employing both self-consistent analytical and numerical techniques [5][6][7][8][9][10]. Arches of a general half-angle of embrace 0 <  <  (including for undercomplete and over-complete, horseshoe circular masonry arches) have been systematically analysed in analytical terms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different solutions have been explicitly derived, and numerically explored, which appeared fully consistent with updated outcomes from a re-discussion by Heyman [4], and prior developments by Ochsendorf [11][12], as well as with classical earlier work by Milankovitch [13] (see Foce [14]), and several most recent attempts that meanwhile have appeared [15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24]. An earlier account on these developments was provided in SAHC10 conference paper [5]; later, a comprehensive analytical treatment with unprecedented closed-form explicit representations was provided in [6], while in [8], consistent comparisons were developed by a Discrete Element Method implementation, in the form of a Discontinuous Deformation Analysis (DDA) tool. Then, first new developments on the role of friction have been preliminarily investigated in such a research mainstream, as initially reported in SAHC12 conference work [7], prodromal to the present one, by releasing Heyman hypothesis 3 of no sliding failure, and accounting for both mixed sliding-rotational and purely-sliding collapse modes (Figs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of its ability to follow the characteristic failure modes and collapse histories of masonry structures in detail, DEM can serve as a tool to check theoretical results with the help of computer-simulated experiments. A characteristic application of DEM can be found in Rizzi, Rusconi and Cocchetti (2014): a discrete element code was used for the comparison of the theoretical predictions for circular arches by Milankovitch (1907), Heyman (1969), and Cochetti, Colasante and Rizzi (2011).…”
Section: The Applied Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With continuous modifications and improvements, twodimensional (2-D) DDA has been more efficient and suitable to cover practical engineering problems of rockfall, 4-7 landslide, [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16] tunneling and mining, [17][18][19][20][21] cavern and underground opening, [22][23][24][25][26][27] masonry structure, [28][29][30] fracture propagation, 31,32 rock blasting [33][34][35] and many others. [36][37][38][39][40][41][42] However, the applications of 2-D DDA are inappropriate to many practical problems because the majority of discontinuities are not always perpendicular to the cross-section of the model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%