2018
DOI: 10.1007/s00411-018-0745-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analytical and quasi-Bayesian methods as development of the iterative approach for mixed radiation biodosimetry

Abstract: The present paper proposes two methods of calculating components of the dose absorbed by the human body after exposure to a mixed neutron and gamma radiation field. The article presents a novel approach to replace the common iterative method in its analytical form, thus reducing the calculation time. It also shows a possibility of estimating the neutron and gamma doses when their ratio in a mixed beam is not precisely known.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Using the Monte Carlo program, the doses and aberration frequencies were assessed in several ways (using the standard calibration curves, Eqs. (10) and (11)):…”
Section: Program Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Using the Monte Carlo program, the doses and aberration frequencies were assessed in several ways (using the standard calibration curves, Eqs. (10) and (11)):…”
Section: Program Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is quite accurate but often requires many iterations and therefore calculations can be lengthy. This method can be modified into the analytical solution proposed recently by us [10], which removes the need for a large number of repetitions and is nothing more than an analytical description of the iterative method, thus, it gives the same results (with better precision). The primary set-back of both of these methods is that neither of them can be used if the γto-neutron ratio is not precisely known.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…There is a large body of literature on various computational biodosimetry approaches for estimating radiation doses in various exposure scenarios based on micronuclei yields and other cytogenetics markers like dicentric chromosomes [22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32] . As compared to uniform photon exposures, both neutron and partial body exposures result in a non-poissonian distribution of damage in the cells scored for biodosimetry due to the shielding and/or differences in radiation track structure and energy deposition patterns.…”
Section: Current Approaches For Evaluating Complex Exposuresmentioning
confidence: 99%