1976
DOI: 10.1016/0584-8547(76)80051-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analytical carbon furnace atomic emission: Temperature measurements and excitation mechanism

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

3
5
0

Year Published

1978
1978
1995
1995

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
3
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The emission signal from the excited-state population could be detected over a longer period of time than the absorption signal from the ground-state population. Observations similar to these were reported by Alder et al (9) when iron was atomized in a HGA-70 furnace. It can also be seen from Figures 2-5 that ionization of Li, K, Rb, and Cs in the graphite furnace at 2300 °C is not significant from the viewpoint of atomic absorption, but ionization interference should be taken into consideration for K, Rb, and Cs when atomic emission signals are measured.…”
supporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The emission signal from the excited-state population could be detected over a longer period of time than the absorption signal from the ground-state population. Observations similar to these were reported by Alder et al (9) when iron was atomized in a HGA-70 furnace. It can also be seen from Figures 2-5 that ionization of Li, K, Rb, and Cs in the graphite furnace at 2300 °C is not significant from the viewpoint of atomic absorption, but ionization interference should be taken into consideration for K, Rb, and Cs when atomic emission signals are measured.…”
supporting
confidence: 88%
“…The question of whether or not ionization interference even occurs with these devices has not been adequately resolved (2-6). Recent data (7)(8)(9)(10)(11) suggest that local thermal equilibrium (LTE) is achieved in tube-type furnaces under the conditions of interrupted purge gas flow. Although the maximun temperatures experienced by atomic vapor in electrothermal atomizers are lower than those attained in a nitrous oxide-acetylene flame, sufficient thermal energy is available through collisional excitation processes to populate upper electronic energy levels lying as much as 5.28 eV above the ground state (2).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the atomization step at 2750 °C some emission lines, not resolved by the polychromator, are observed: these lines are attributed to excited vanadium atoms (305.6,306.0,306.6 and 318.3,318.4,318.5 nm) and to excited nickel atoms (lines from 335 to 350 nm) (11,12)•, as reported above, the system does not distinguish excited from ground state atoms, but simply detects the sum of emission and absorption. Therefore it can be deduced that the excited atoms contribute significantly to the overall behavior of the vapor phase, in agreement with previous observations (13,14).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…It is assumed that local thermal equilibrium is achieved in the furnace and that the temperature of the analyte vapor has equilibrated to that of the wall at each point in time. Substantial experimental data support this view (15)(16)(17)(18). It is further assumed that ionization is thermal in origin (no chemi-ionization) and that the analyte is only singly ionized with no significant molecular ionization.…”
Section: Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The relatively low temperature in the graphite furnace would not promote second ionization. Recent evidence suggests that ionization of metal vapors occurs predominantly by thermal processes (14,15,17).…”
Section: Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%