2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.compscitech.2010.05.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analytical elastic stiffness model for 3D woven orthogonal interlock composites

Abstract: This research presents the development of an analytical model to predict the elastic stiffness performance of orthogonal interlock bound 3D woven composites as a consequence of altering the weaving parameters and constituent material types. The present approach formulates expressions at the micro level with the aim of calculating more representative volume fractions of a group of elements to the layer. The rationale in representing the volume fractions within the unit cell more accurately was to improve the el… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
15
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
2
15
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 2 shows the microstructure of the 2.5D shallow straight-joint structure and illustrates geometry parameters of the fabric and RUC. In this work, the unit cell is representative of one repeat of the 2.5D shallow straight-joint architecture [18] , and takes into account the actual geometry including the yarn cross-sectional area. It can be seen from Figure 2 that the spatial path of warp yarn is sinusoidal and the spatial path of weft yarn is straight, and the crosssectional shape of weft yarn is lenticular and rhombus, respectively.…”
Section: Unit Cell Geometrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 2 shows the microstructure of the 2.5D shallow straight-joint structure and illustrates geometry parameters of the fabric and RUC. In this work, the unit cell is representative of one repeat of the 2.5D shallow straight-joint architecture [18] , and takes into account the actual geometry including the yarn cross-sectional area. It can be seen from Figure 2 that the spatial path of warp yarn is sinusoidal and the spatial path of weft yarn is straight, and the crosssectional shape of weft yarn is lenticular and rhombus, respectively.…”
Section: Unit Cell Geometrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In most of these models, different geometries have been assumed for the cross-section shapes of the yarns such as rectangular (Tan et al [8]), lenticular (Quinn et al [9]) and ellipsoidal (Brown and Wu [10], Wu [11] and Buchanan et al [12]). However, more recent models [13,14] take into account the undulation of the yarns along the fill and warp directions induced by the binder yarn and how it affects their cross-section.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The multi-scale models can be characterized as constitutive models in which composite's global constitutive response is defined simultaneously throughout the simulation. Moreover, several analytical solutions 9,[28][29][30][31] for practical issues are restricted to basic geometries and simplified simulations. For the subsequent analysis did not represent the progressive damage growth as predicted by many researchers, 32,33 which promotes the adaptation of several multi-scale models and finite element method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%