2014 IEEE/ASME International Conference on Advanced Intelligent Mechatronics 2014
DOI: 10.1109/aim.2014.6878266
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analytical inverse kinematic solution with self-motion constraint for the 7-DOF restore robot arm

Abstract: This paper presents an analytical inverse kinematic (IK) solution for the seven degree-of-freedom (7-DOF) "Restore" robot arm with non-zero joint offsets. We provide two closed-form solutions -the shoulder-elbow-wrist (SEW) IK and the θ 1 -based solution. Both allow self-motion and together they solve the problem of algorithmic singularities within the workspace. Non-zero link offsets require careful selection of shoulder, elbow, and wrist locations. The solution is simple, fast and exact, providing full solut… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
(16 reference statements)
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The joint angle θ4 is solved first, then θ1:θ3, and finally θ5:θ7. The detailed solution method is referred to the literature (Gong et al , 2019; An et al , 2014; Liu et al , 2017) and is not specifically given in this paper.…”
Section: Verification Of Joint Motion Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The joint angle θ4 is solved first, then θ1:θ3, and finally θ5:θ7. The detailed solution method is referred to the literature (Gong et al , 2019; An et al , 2014; Liu et al , 2017) and is not specifically given in this paper.…”
Section: Verification Of Joint Motion Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The redundant structure was designed to improve the flexibility ratio in the operational space and to extend the joint limiter of the robot manipulator. 18…”
Section: -Dof Redundant Robot Manipulator Designsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The redundant structure was designed to improve the flexibility ratio in the operational space and to extend the joint limiter of the robot manipulator. 18 Figure 1 shows the software and hardware system architecture configurations consisting of three main parts: (1) system interface, (2) movement control, and (3) hardware device management. This was designed as a closed-loop control system with its interface receiving user's input commands and/or the sensory information coming from the outside.…”
Section: -Dof Redundant Robot Manipulator Designsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hollerbach [1] was the first to propose a description to the manifold as the angle between a reference plane and the plane formed by the shoulder, 20 elbow and wrist -later called "arm angle" [6]. Other methods to describe the self-motion were later introduced [7,8]. The redundant degree of freedom enables the manipulator to perform secondary tasks aside from reaching a specific position and orientation [9], such as: singularities [10,11,12] and joint limits avoidance [13,14,15], obstacle avoidance [16,17], minimise energy dissipation [18], enhance manipulability [19] and human-like motions [7,20,21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The kinematic control of a redundant manipulator can be achieved by position-or velocity-based inverse meth- 25 ods, the latter being considered the standard approach to derive the inverse kinematic expressions of redundant manipulators [22,23]. However, velocity-based control exhibits several disadvantages when compared to positionbased control: i) computationally more expensive, returning only one solution [8,24]; ii) difficult to map joint limits or configurations in the velocity domain [25]; iii) subject to error instability due to cumulative errors; iv) requires the pre-assignment of the Cartesian trajectory to follow [26]; v) Jacobian inversion consequent singularities [27]. 30 Position-based closed-form solutions were deemed too difficult or impossible to derive due to the infinite number of joint configurations as a solution to the joint space manifold [26].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%