2015
DOI: 10.1002/tal.1214
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analytical investigation of hybrid composite precast beams with modified strain compatibility for entire history of nominal flexural capacity

Abstract: SUMMARYThe strain compatibility documented in Chapter I of the American Institute of Steel Construction 360-10 (AISC, 2010) was modified to provide accurate analytical solution for hybrid composite precast beams. In the proposed method, locations of neutral axis of the section are investigated to formulate all possible equilibrium equations of stress fields of composite sections. The only neutral axis satisfying all stress fields is then found for composite sections for entire loading history including yield a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They also proposed a simplified formula to evaluate ductility of high-strength CES columns. Hong et al (2015) presented a "modified strain compatibility approach" for a broad range of yield and load limit states which was limited to the frame without axial loads. This approach also did not consider the confining effect provided by steel sections to accurately predict the nominal flexural capacity, leading to inaccurate predicted strengths of the composite frames.…”
Section: Previous Research and Objectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They also proposed a simplified formula to evaluate ductility of high-strength CES columns. Hong et al (2015) presented a "modified strain compatibility approach" for a broad range of yield and load limit states which was limited to the frame without axial loads. This approach also did not consider the confining effect provided by steel sections to accurately predict the nominal flexural capacity, leading to inaccurate predicted strengths of the composite frames.…”
Section: Previous Research and Objectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The interaction between the two materials with integrating pre-cast concrete with steel components presents advantages in terms of reduced structural steel tonnage, shortened construction schedules, and eliminated fire proofs. The precast composite beam has also shown the outstanding structural efficiencies to reduce beam depth as published in the previous works of authors (Hong et al 2008a(Hong et al , 2008b(Hong et al , 2015. Figure 3(a) illustrates a test specimen including 4 continuous vertical reinforcing bars and 20 vertical re-bars that were cut off by connecting them to steel plates by means of bolts, above and below the column steel.…”
Section: Problem Statementmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Upon yielding, the strain of the RCVB was approximately linearly distributed on the section, identically to that of the RC beams. [33,34] However, the longitudinal stress of a part of the bottom chord may have been released owing to the upward movement of the beam's neutral axis and the development of horizontal cracks in the shear key during failure, which resulted in an inflection point in the strain distribution along the section height.…”
Section: Strain Distribution Of Sectionmentioning
confidence: 99%