2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2022.128137
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analytical model for predicting the lateral profiles of velocities through a partially vegetated channel

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The well‐established SKM model is widely employed to simulate depth–mean velocity ( U d ) profiles in two‐stage channels with smooth floodplains. Subsequently, several modified SKM models have been developed, and their application has been improved in vegetated two‐stage channels (e.g., Liu, Luo, Liu, & Yang, 2013; Sanjou et al, 2010; Shiono et al, 2012; Yan et al, 2022; Zhang et al, 2017). However, in all these SKM and modified SKM models, the λ is simplified as a constant in each panel.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The well‐established SKM model is widely employed to simulate depth–mean velocity ( U d ) profiles in two‐stage channels with smooth floodplains. Subsequently, several modified SKM models have been developed, and their application has been improved in vegetated two‐stage channels (e.g., Liu, Luo, Liu, & Yang, 2013; Sanjou et al, 2010; Shiono et al, 2012; Yan et al, 2022; Zhang et al, 2017). However, in all these SKM and modified SKM models, the λ is simplified as a constant in each panel.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite their contributions towards reproducing and forecasting the vegetated overbank flow, all of these models incorporate a large number of complex calculations to solve the Navier–Stokes equation. Recently, several researchers have developed analytical models for both emergent and submerged rigid vegetation (Fu et al, 2021; Huai et al, 2009; Huthoff et al, 2007; Konings et al, 2013; Shi et al, 2019; Tang, 2019; Tinoco et al, 2015; Wang et al, 2019; Yan et al, 2022; Yang et al, 2020); these can effectively estimate overbank flow characteristics in a simple manner.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding an emergent canopy, flow diversion occurs approximately 1 D upstream of the canopy (Rominger & Nepf, 2011; D is the canopy width), resulting in reduced velocity in the vegetated region and enhanced velocity in the adjacent bare channel (e.g., Liu & Shan, 2022). The velocity difference between the vegetated region and bare channel produces a shear layer associated with lateral mass and momentum exchange (e.g., Chen et al., 2010; Yan et al., 2022) and causes bed erosion at the leading and side edges of the canopy (Bouma et al., 2007; Follett & Nepf, 2012; Kim et al., 2015). Within the canopy, it has been confirmed that flow velocity adjustment in the streamwise direction can be expressed by exponential decay (Chen et al., 2013; Zong & Nepf, 2010), and Liu et al.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Originally proposed by Leopold and Wolman [2], braided rivers have distinctive geomorphological features, including scattered and fragmented planforms, easily eroded and deposited sandbars, and channels that are constantly branching and reconfiguring, while the complex movement of water and sediment within these rivers makes their geomorphological units highly dynamic [3,4]. These characteristics make it impossible to predict the evolution of flow velocity and sediment deposition in braided rivers by constructing analytical models, as is the case for straight or meandering rivers [5][6][7][8], and therefore, it is difficult to predict the evolution of braided rivers from the point of view of flow structure. The bed structure of braided rivers is complex and variable due to a variety of factors such as different flow and sediment conditions, particle morphology, grain size gradation, and spatial distribution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%