2002
DOI: 10.1207/s15328031us0103_02
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analyzing Ordered Responses: A Review of the Ordered Probit Model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
91
0
2

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 199 publications
(93 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
91
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Daykin and Moffatt (2002). The marginal effects of a change in an explanatory variable are therefore analysed via the change in the cell probabilities.…”
Section: Econometric Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Daykin and Moffatt (2002). The marginal effects of a change in an explanatory variable are therefore analysed via the change in the cell probabilities.…”
Section: Econometric Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast to the MNL model, in ordered-response models auto-ownership level is considered as an ordinal scale (Y 0, 1, 2, F F F , j, F F F , J ). This assumes an underlying latent continuous variable, Y Ã , representing a household's propensity to own cars (Daykin and Moffatt, 2002). Y Ã is expressed in the following form:…”
Section: Analysis Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since it is measured on ordinal scales, we develop ordered models (refer to Daykin and Moffatt 2002 for an introduction to ordered probit model). Again, since riders rate conventional bus, BRT, and metro simultaneously, their overall satisfactions are likely to be jointly influenced by unobserved factors (such as their intrinsic affection toward transit), which are captured by error terms.…”
Section: Factors Influencing Overall Satisfactionmentioning
confidence: 99%