2010 International Conference on Science and Social Research (CSSR 2010) 2010
DOI: 10.1109/cssr.2010.5773856
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analyzing personality types to predict team performance

Abstract: This paper presents an approach in analyzing personality types, temperament and team diversity to determine software engineering (SE) teams performance. The benefits of understanding personality types and its relationships amongst team members are crucial for project success. Rough set analysis was used to analyze Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) personality types, Keirsey temperament, team diversity, and team performance. The result shows positive relationships between these attributes.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Among these factors, the formation of an unsuitable team was found to have the most impact. 38,39 Based on research by Bell, 40 team composition is a formation of team members according to their contributions in influencing the team processes and outcomes. Bell has also affirmed that the team composition research that has been carried out in past studies can be categorized into 3 types: (1) team member characteristics (eg, member abilities, demographics, personality traits, and number of team members), (2) measurement of team member characteristics, (3) and team composition developed using an analytical perspective.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among these factors, the formation of an unsuitable team was found to have the most impact. 38,39 Based on research by Bell, 40 team composition is a formation of team members according to their contributions in influencing the team processes and outcomes. Bell has also affirmed that the team composition research that has been carried out in past studies can be categorized into 3 types: (1) team member characteristics (eg, member abilities, demographics, personality traits, and number of team members), (2) measurement of team member characteristics, (3) and team composition developed using an analytical perspective.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Empirical data from [15][16][17][18] was used in this study. The data set consists of 120 data sets collected during two comparison studies and one case study conducted in an academic setting, where participants were software engineering (SE) students.…”
Section: Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[3] proposes a framework to investigate the relationship personality traits versus software team diversity by using the notion of rough set theory. This study reveals that heterogeneous types of personalities in a software team supports creativity and effective when there are challenging tasks.…”
Section: Table I Dichotomies (The Four Oposite Pairs Of Preferences) mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, to improve software productivity, the social aspects such as individuals' compatibility in a team has emerged as a research interest with a focus on personality traits over software team configuration [2], which directly affects the quality of knowledge exchange among the team members. It is therefore not surprising that several researchers in the field of software engineering focus on the effects of personality types on the software development process and organizational performance [3], [4], [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%