2021
DOI: 10.1111/risa.13694
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analyzing Risk of Service Failures in Heavy Haul Rail Lines: A Hybrid Approach for Imbalanced Data

Abstract: An incident in which a rail defect of size over a threshold value is noticed and the track is taken out of service is known as a service failure. This article aims at building accurate prediction models with binary outcome for risk of service failures on heavy haul rail segments. An analysis of the factors that influence the risk of a service failure is conducted and quantitative models are developed to predict locations where service failures are most likely to occur until the next inspection. To this end, da… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Gross tonnage, presence of geometry defects, ambient temperature, segment length and rail defect presence are the most important factors for predicting the risk of service failures [ 16 ]. The fundamental approach of applying digital twins to railway turnouts requires the consideration and identification of rail temperature conditions as a component in the acquisition of turnout condition data and the ability to apply appropriate diagnostics.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gross tonnage, presence of geometry defects, ambient temperature, segment length and rail defect presence are the most important factors for predicting the risk of service failures [ 16 ]. The fundamental approach of applying digital twins to railway turnouts requires the consideration and identification of rail temperature conditions as a component in the acquisition of turnout condition data and the ability to apply appropriate diagnostics.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the rise of big data and artificial intelligence, some areas related to economy and personal safety, such as housing price prediction (Rafiei & Adeli, 2016), flood prediction (Dong et al., 2021), building damage level estimation (Cheng et al., 2021), structural damage identification (Y. Gao et al., 2021; Jiang et al., 2021), structural optimization (S. Li et al., 2021), and safety helmet wearing detection (J. Shen et al., 2021), have been rapidly developed. At the same time, big data analytics have also received strong attention from researchers and engineers in the field of transportation (Ghofrani et al., 2018), including traffic prediction (X. Ma et al., 2017; Tao et al., 2021; Yu et al., 2017), crack detection (Bang et al., 2019), rail breaks arrival rate prediction (Ghofrani, Yousefianmoghadam, et al., 2020), risk prediction of service failures in heavy haul rail lines (Ghofrani et al., 2021), image segmentation and recognition of railroad components (Guo et al., 2021), railway alignment optimization (Song et al., 2021; T. Gao et al., 2021), and so forth. Some data‐driven or machine learning models have also been utilized to identify rail defects and assist in decision‐making in geo‐defect rectification (He et al., 2015; Mohammadi et al 2019; Sharma et al., 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the same time, big data analytics have also received strong attention from researchers and engineers in the field of transportation (Ghofrani et al, 2018), including traffic prediction (X. Ma et al, 2017;Tao et al, 2021;Yu et al, 2017), crack detection (Bang et al, 2019), rail breaks arrival rate prediction (Ghofrani, Yousefianmoghadam, et al, 2020), risk prediction of service failures in heavy haul rail lines (Ghofrani et al, 2021), image segmentation and recognition of railroad components (Guo et al, 2021), railway alignment optimization (Song et al, 2021;T. Gao et al, 2021), and so forth.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recent study proposed by Zhang et al [8] used multisource of data, including track characteristics and traffic information to predict rail breaks. Ghofrani et al [9] applied a gradient boosting machine to analyze the risk of rail breaks by considering geometry data and monthly average temperature. While the track characteristics data are potentially relevant to the appearance of rail breaks, such data remain constant over a large region, which may not be suitable for identifying rail breaks at a specific location.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the track characteristics data are potentially relevant to the appearance of rail breaks, such data remain constant over a large region, which may not be suitable for identifying rail breaks at a specific location. The foot-by-foot track geometry data used by Ghofrani et al [9], however, is difficult to capture potential rail breaks in an early stage due to the long datacollection interval.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%