2008
DOI: 10.1007/s11165-008-9089-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analyzing the Effect of Metaconceptual Teaching Practices on Students’ Understanding of Force and Motion Concepts

Abstract: This study investigated the effect of metaconceptual teaching interventions on students' understanding of force and motion concepts. A multimethod research design including quasi-experimental design and case study designs was employed to compare the effect of the metaconceptual activities and traditional instruction and investigate students' reactions to metaconceptual teaching interventions. The participants (45 high school students in the USA) were enrolled in one of the two physics classes instructed by the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
47
0
8

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
3
47
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…Meanwhile, the inquiry method may lead to the supreme conflict in students who are fond of verifying things by hands-on activities and observation. Yuruk et al (2009) pointed out that metaconceptual knowledge and processes can be classified into four components: metaconceptual knowledge, metaconceptual awareness, metaconceptual monitoring, and metaconceptual evaluation. In Chinese physics curriculum standard of the full-time compulsory education (2001), science inquiry is resolved to seven components, such as "raising a question", "guessing and hypothesizing", "drawing up a plan and designing the experiment", "carrying out the experiment and gathering the evidence", "analyzing and proving", "evaluating", "communicating and cooperating".…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Meanwhile, the inquiry method may lead to the supreme conflict in students who are fond of verifying things by hands-on activities and observation. Yuruk et al (2009) pointed out that metaconceptual knowledge and processes can be classified into four components: metaconceptual knowledge, metaconceptual awareness, metaconceptual monitoring, and metaconceptual evaluation. In Chinese physics curriculum standard of the full-time compulsory education (2001), science inquiry is resolved to seven components, such as "raising a question", "guessing and hypothesizing", "drawing up a plan and designing the experiment", "carrying out the experiment and gathering the evidence", "analyzing and proving", "evaluating", "communicating and cooperating".…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They are aware of there must be some changes regarding their conceptual framework in order to answer the question they proposed. In this component they had to recognize the elements of their existing conceptual structure which has been defined by Yuruk et al (2009) as metaconceptual awareness. The second component "guessing and hypothesizing" requires students to put forward hypothesis based on their experience and prior knowledge.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Meta-cognitive thinking was found to be effective in students' performances (Boulware-Gooden et al, 2007). And it can monitor students' conceptual understanding and thinking process (Yuruk et al, 2009). In practice, the mandatory scaffold can also make tasks more tractable and productive for learners (Quintana et al, 2004).…”
Section: Linking Together: Conceptual Learning Inquiry-based Learninmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…No toda la literatura está de acuerdo en la importancia de partir de esta insatisfacción (Potvin, Mercier, Charland y Riopel, 2011), pero nuestra posición es que para transferir es necesario esta toma de conciencia, siempre que se ayude a aceptar emocionalmente que los errores son algo normal en todo proceso de aprendizaje y que aprendemos a partir de ellos. Las personas que son conscientes de los cambios en sus ideas son menos propensas a usar sus concepciones previas, ya que este proceso de seguimiento tiene una capacidad para generar información acerca de la validez de sus ideas actuales y anteriores, así como sus justificaciones de los cambios en ellas (Yuruk et al, 2009).…”
Section: Reflexiones Finalesunclassified