2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.omega.2015.01.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analyzing the impact of investment spikes on dynamic productivity growth

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
41
0
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
2
41
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The decomposition of input‐ and investment‐specific dynamic productivity growth indicators in (a and b) show that these indicators provide more information on the sources of productivity growth than dynamic productivity growth measures accounting for all inputs simultaneously that dominate the existing literature (see for example Kapelko et al ., ,c, ; Oude Lansink et al ., ).…”
Section: Input‐specific Productivity Change In a Dynamic Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The decomposition of input‐ and investment‐specific dynamic productivity growth indicators in (a and b) show that these indicators provide more information on the sources of productivity growth than dynamic productivity growth measures accounting for all inputs simultaneously that dominate the existing literature (see for example Kapelko et al ., ,c, ; Oude Lansink et al ., ).…”
Section: Input‐specific Productivity Change In a Dynamic Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Silva and Stefanou () advance a non‐parametric approach to dynamic production analysis that distinguishes between the variable and the dynamic factors, and serves as a foundation for the measurement of dynamic productivity and efficiency measurement . Luenberger‐based approaches that have followed can decompose productivity change to identify the contributions of technical inefficiency change, scale inefficiency change and technical change (Kapelko et al ., ,c, ; Oude Lansink et al ., ). However, the existing dynamic approaches do not consider input‐specific contributions to dynamic productivity growth, which is demonstrated in this paper.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Oude defined a dynamic Luenberger indicator that accounts for the dynamic nature of firms' production decisions through adjustment costs related to firms' investments. The dynamic Luenberger indicator was subsequently extended by Kapelko et al (2015a) and applied elsewhere (Kapelko et al 2015b(Kapelko et al , 2016(Kapelko et al , 2017a.…”
Section: Dynamic Luenberger Productivity Growth Indicator and Its Decmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(meat and dairy processing and oils and fats industries), Kapelko et al (2015b) (meat processing industry), and Kapelko et al (2016) (meat processing and oils and fats industries); all of these studies found that average productivity is very close to zero, with its components telling a story of negative technical change, and positive technical inefficiency change and scale inefficiency change. Kapelko et al (2017b) reached similar conclusions regarding static productivity growth in the Spanish dairy processing industry.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sample is sufficiently large to conduct the inefficiency analysis and make statistical inferences about the impact of different factors on inefficiency (Golany and Roll 1989;Boussofiane et al 1991;Bowlin 1998;Friedman and Sinuany-Stern 1998;Dyson et al 2001). The data set was corrected for outliers using the approach outlined in Kapelko et al (2015b) 3 . 1 AU: Animal Unit is a standard unit used in calculating the relative grazing impact of different kinds and classes of livestock.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%