2016
DOI: 10.1111/1477-9552.12188
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Input‐Specific Dynamic Productivity Change: Measurement and Application to European Dairy Manufacturing Firms

Abstract: We propose a new method for measuring and decomposing input‐specific productivity change in a dynamic context. The resulting input‐specific dynamic Luenberger productivity change indicator is decomposed to identify the contributions of input‐specific dynamic technical, technical inefficiency and scale inefficiency changes. The empirical application of the paper focuses on panel data of large firms in the European dairy processing industry over the period 2005–2012. The results show similar patterns for dynamic… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
18
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
2
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to determine the weighted coefficients of the group indicators of cost management efficiency, it is recommended that experts be interviewed in the form of interviews (Kotler, 2007;Mihalovich, 2016). For obtaining the expert assessment, the Delphi method was proposed, which is a kind of method of collective expert assessments, as it has quite significant advantages (Beshelev, 1980;Kapelko, 2016).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to determine the weighted coefficients of the group indicators of cost management efficiency, it is recommended that experts be interviewed in the form of interviews (Kotler, 2007;Mihalovich, 2016). For obtaining the expert assessment, the Delphi method was proposed, which is a kind of method of collective expert assessments, as it has quite significant advantages (Beshelev, 1980;Kapelko, 2016).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If adjustment costs are external to a firm, then one cannot argue that a firm is inefficient (Stefanou ) because the observed inefficiency is the firm's optimal response to a short‐run cost. There is a growing literature on dynamic adjustments (e.g., Silva and Stefanou , ; Kapelko et al ), most predicated on the notion that some inputs are fixed in the short run. In contrast, our argument focuses on the limited supply of rights to produce, even though we acknowledge that there are constraints limiting the adjustments of some inputs.…”
Section: Input Lumps Technological Jumps and Efficiencymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This paper, however, relies on the dynamic approach which seeks to link the decisions on input adjustment made within different time periods. The patterns of dynamic efficiency have been widely studied across different countries and sectors (Serra et al, 2011;Rungsuriyawiboon, Hockmann, 2015;Kapelko et al, 2016aKapelko et al, , 2016bKapelko, Oude Lansink, 2017;Mikócziová, 2010;Krylovas et al, 2016). However, the analysis of dynamic efficiency in Lithuanian agriculture has received much less attention in the literature (Baležentis, 2016).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%