This paper discusses possible policies to handle English as a medium of instruction for higher education (HE) in Denmark. It summarizes the de-facto status of the institutionalization of English as a lingua franca and EMI inEurope, is to be found in Italy: over 100 faculty members went to court to reverse the process of introducing EMI programs at Milan Polytechnic. The regional administrative court ruled in favor of their point of view (Severgnini, 2015). In Central and Eastern Europe, by contrast, EMI seems to be slowly but steadily on the rise (Coleman, 2006).Whilst proponents point to the benefits of EMI for, amongst other things, content learning and graduate employability, opponents bring up arguments varying from being victimized by cultural imperialism to educational elitism. Both recent research results and public opinions will be presented in the present paper. The purpose of this paper is to focus on the implications of the intensified EMI use for HE practitioners in Denmark.It is intended to present, and comment on, recent insights into the above mentioned research, under consideration and in connection with relevant strands of public opinion.
56
C ommunication & Language at WorkIssue no. 4The following section 2 gives an overview of the status of English and EMI in Denmark. This overview is the basis for the introduction of the 'four perspectives' in research and the public debate on EMI. Perspectives and debate are then explored in section 3. One of the perspectives, the 'cautiously progressive perspective' is largely derived from this author's research on EMI, which will briefly be documented. Finally, in section 4, there will be a discussion of implications inherent in arguments and perspectives as presented in previous sections.
The status of English and of English as a medium of instruction in Denmark