2019 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) 2019
DOI: 10.1109/iccv.2019.01005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analyzing the Variety Loss in the Context of Probabilistic Trajectory Prediction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several recently introduced metrics follow a sampling approach to evaluate a probability distribution. The minimum average displacement error (mADE) metric (Rhinehart et al, 2019; Schöller et al, 2019; Tang and Salakhutdinov, 2019; Thiede and Brahma, 2019; Walker et al, 2016), as well as variety loss, oracle, minimum over N , best-of- N , top n% , or minimum mean squared distance (minMSD), computes Euclidean distance between the ground-truth position of the agent s t * at time t and the closest (or the n % closest) of the K samples from the predicted probability distribution: min k s t * s t k . Similarly, minimum final displacement error (mFDE) evaluates only the distribution at the prediction horizon T .…”
Section: Motion Prediction Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several recently introduced metrics follow a sampling approach to evaluate a probability distribution. The minimum average displacement error (mADE) metric (Rhinehart et al, 2019; Schöller et al, 2019; Tang and Salakhutdinov, 2019; Thiede and Brahma, 2019; Walker et al, 2016), as well as variety loss, oracle, minimum over N , best-of- N , top n% , or minimum mean squared distance (minMSD), computes Euclidean distance between the ground-truth position of the agent s t * at time t and the closest (or the n % closest) of the K samples from the predicted probability distribution: min k s t * s t k . Similarly, minimum final displacement error (mFDE) evaluates only the distribution at the prediction horizon T .…”
Section: Motion Prediction Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Simultaneously, Refs. [14,15,20] also proposed probability networks to incorporate randomness into vehicle trajectory prediction. However, these works all treat position information as two-dimensional point coordinates for input into the prediction model; doing so cannot completely describe the random behavior of pedestrians.…”
Section: Multi-outcome Trajectory Forecastingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To account for uncertainty and multi-modality in prediction space, generative adversarial networks (GAN) [17] and variational autoencoders (VAE) [18], [19] are used to generate multiple trajectory predictions by sampling a latent space. Several works have attempted to improve coverage of the possible outcomes [1], [3], [20], [21], yet there is an inherent tradeoff between accurately representing the trajectory distribution and covering a diverse set of intents [1], [2], [3]. To account for this trade-off between accuracy and coverage explicitly, hybrid models are proposed to classify discrete intent and generate continuous trajectories conditioned on the intent.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given a set of observed discrete-continuous future agent states O = (O x , O z ) 2 and context states C, we want to learn a hybrid model parameterized by θ that maximizes the following data log likelihood [31], as a maximum likelihood 2 While the continuous state can be directly observed from perception systems, the discrete observation can be estimated from continuous observations, as discussed in Sec. III-A.…”
Section: B Hybrid Model Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation