2016
DOI: 10.1515/raon-2016-0041
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anatomic variations of the pancreatic duct and their relevance with the Cambridge classification system: MRCP findings of 1158 consecutive patients

Abstract: BackgroundThe study was conducted to evaluate the frequencies of the anatomic variations and the gender distributions of these variations of the pancreatic duct and their relevance with the Cambridge classification system as morphological sign of chronic pancreatitis using magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP).Patients and methodsWe retrospectively reviewed 1312 consecutive patients who referred to our department for MRCP between January 2013 and August 2015. We excluded 154 patients from the stud… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

4
44
0
3

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
4
44
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The results of our analysis are similar to those presented in current literature [1][2]11]. The most common variants of the MPD in our sample were pancreas divisum and ansa pancreatica.…”
supporting
confidence: 91%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The results of our analysis are similar to those presented in current literature [1][2]11]. The most common variants of the MPD in our sample were pancreas divisum and ansa pancreatica.…”
supporting
confidence: 91%
“…The total number of anatomic variations in general population is low, but in patients suffering from pancreatic diseases this rate is much higher [1][2][3][4]11]. According to the current literature, pancreas divisum is the most common anatomic variant of pancreatic duct in the general population [11]. It is caused by a failure to fuse the ventral and dorsal ducts of the embryonic pancreas during embryonic development [1,[11][12][13].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Results showed 62.5% for descending versus 75.4% at our present study, 30% for sigmoid versus 18.7% at our present study, 5.5% for vertical versus 4.4% at our present study and 2% for loop versus 1.2% at our present study. 27 In Korea, a study was carried out to detect anomalies of the pancreaticobiliary ducts of Koreans. Choledocal cyst was identified in 0.32% of its cases versus 1.2% in the current study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%