Tbe study-test paradigm was used to investigate memory acquisition processes and tbe effects of repetition on long-term recognition memory. In tbis procedure, subjects are presented witb a list of words ("targets") to be memorized (Study series). Tbey are later tested for recognition on a word list comprised of tbe target words mixed randomly witb an equal number of new, distractor words (Test series). Botb reaction time and tbe P300 component of tbe event-related brain potential were used as measures of processing time. During tbe Study series, large P300s were elicited despite a word category probability of 1.0. Wben tbe words from tbe Study series were divided on tbe basis of recognition performance, words tbat were subsequently recognized elicited P300s witb sborter latencies tban unrecognized words. P300 amplitude to words in tbe Study series increased witb repetition wbile maintaining a constant latency. During tbe Test series, P300 latency and reaction time decreased witb repetition for botb target and distractor words. P300 amplitude to all words increased substantially over Test repetitions witb tai^et words eliciting larger P300s tban distractor words. Words tbat were recognized more consistently during tbe Test series elicited larger and earlier P300s tban words tbat were recognized less consistently. Tbe P300 amplitude and latency results from botb tbe Study and Test series are interpreted as reflecting tbe increased discriminability of tbe target words as tbe memory trace increases in strengtb.DESCRIPTORS: Event-related potentials, P300, Recognition memory.The P300 component of the event-related brain potential (ERP) has been found to index cognitive processing in a variety of paradigms. There are two parameters of the P300 that provide unique indices of information processing-amplitude and latency. P300 amplitude varies directly with the amount of information processing invoked by a stimulus (i.e., processing load) and varies inversely with the subjective probability of a stimulus (Duncan-Johnson