1996
DOI: 10.1007/bf01411716
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anatomical and technical aspects of the contralateral approach for multiple aneurysms

Abstract: Microsurgery of multiple aneurysms is still a controversial subject. In order to avoid the risk of rebleeding and the consequent increase in morbidity in such cases all aneurysms or at least as many aneurysms as possible should be treated in the first operative procedure. To reach that goal aneurysms located on the contralateral side should also be considered for clipping during the first operation. Between 1984 and 1994 a series of 51 patients harboring multiple aneurysms of which 55 aneurysms were located on… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
30
0
4

Year Published

1996
1996
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
30
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Considering patients with multiple and bilateral aneurysms, which account for 32% of all patients treated in our department annually 10 , a single craniotomy has the advantage of avoiding a second approach and anaesthesia, and reducing the risks of rebleeding 11 , especially when an acute surgery is not possible. This technique, however, is not recommended for all the patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considering patients with multiple and bilateral aneurysms, which account for 32% of all patients treated in our department annually 10 , a single craniotomy has the advantage of avoiding a second approach and anaesthesia, and reducing the risks of rebleeding 11 , especially when an acute surgery is not possible. This technique, however, is not recommended for all the patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The successful management of supratentorial aneurysms by keyhole supraorbital craniotomy has recently been reported 9,10,13,17,21,24,[26][27][28][29][30][31][32] . However, a remarkable controversy remains regarding the choice between the supraorbital keyhole approach 9,32) , and the pterional approach 12,16) , which is the traditional method for the surgical management of patients with anterior circulation aneurysms. Here, we describe our preliminary experience with the supraor-bital keyhole approach for the clipping of anterior circulation aneurysms and compare it with the traditional pterional approach in terms of patient's subjective outcome assessment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Microsurgical clipping of these aneurysms remains challenging due to their anatomical complexity, the need for anterior clinoidectomy, poorly accessible proximal control, the need for complex clip configurations like rightangle fenestrated clipping, and proximity to vital structures, including optic nerve, carotid artery, and cavernous sinus. Surgical results with ophthalmic segment aneurysms have improved with advances in microsurgical technique and anatomical research (2,4,6,8,13,14), but so too have endovascular results, especially with the introduction of stentassisted coiling and flow diverters. Early experiences with the pipeline embolization device and other similar devices have been favorable in the ophthalmic segment, limiting surgical indications to aneurysms with wide necks, large or giant size, intraluminal thrombus, optic nerve compression, recurrence after prior endovascular therapy, and contraindication to antiplatelet therapy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%