2006
DOI: 10.1080/10976640600713731
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anatomical Assessment of Congenital Heart Disease

Abstract: Cardiac MRI (CMR) is replacing diagnostic cardiac catheterization as the modality of choice for anatomic and functional characterization of congenital heart disease (CHD) when echocardiographic imaging is insufficient. In this manuscript, we discuss the principles of anatomic imaging of CHD, placing emphasis on the appropriate choice and modification of pulse sequences necessary to evaluate infants and small children. Clinical examples are provided to illustrate the relative strengths and shortcomings of diffe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These findings support the previously stated hypothesis [ 12 - 14 ] that CMR in paediatric and adult CHD is a tool for answering questions regarding specific individual morphology and hemodynamic function of known anatomy. This is in contrast to the perception that the primary goal of CMR in paediatric and adult CHD is to describe the location and anatomy of a congenital heart defect [ 15 - 18 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…These findings support the previously stated hypothesis [ 12 - 14 ] that CMR in paediatric and adult CHD is a tool for answering questions regarding specific individual morphology and hemodynamic function of known anatomy. This is in contrast to the perception that the primary goal of CMR in paediatric and adult CHD is to describe the location and anatomy of a congenital heart defect [ 15 - 18 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Despite the inherent flow related artifacts of the cine TFE sequence, this sequence is still preferred over SSFP for morphologic evaluation of extra-cardiac vascular pathology (Fig. 4), especially in smaller patients (Wood 2006 manufacturer, is acquired with breath-holding, and yields excellent quality images for intracardiac morphology and ventricular function (Fig. 5).…”
Section: Cine Bright Blood Imagingmentioning
confidence: 98%