1981
DOI: 10.1016/0006-8993(81)90194-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anatomical organization of neurons descending from the supraesophageal ganglion of the lobster

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1987
1987
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since hemi- and holo- metabolous insects diverged at least 280 million years ago 33 66 67 , the similarities in the number and distribution of DNs among these insects implies a high level of conservation. In addition to the conservation in DN numbers across the insect class, the number of supraesophageal DNs in lobster have been estimated to be around 600–700 68 , suggesting that DN numbers are conserved across arthropods.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since hemi- and holo- metabolous insects diverged at least 280 million years ago 33 66 67 , the similarities in the number and distribution of DNs among these insects implies a high level of conservation. In addition to the conservation in DN numbers across the insect class, the number of supraesophageal DNs in lobster have been estimated to be around 600–700 68 , suggesting that DN numbers are conserved across arthropods.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the same time, there are only single data on the results of the electrical stimulation of the cerebral ganglia in the crayfish, contrary to many studies of such kind in insects, since the 1960s (Huber, 1960) up to now (Heinrich, 2002). Despite the thorough investigation of many brain neuropils and their interconnections (Sandeman et al, 1992;Sandeman et al, 1995;Sullivan & Beltz, 2001, there is almost no anatomical evidence on the localization of the descending neurons within the brain (Horiuchi et al, 1971;Notvest & Page, 1981).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%