2004
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-28626-4_24
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anatomy Dependent Multi-context Fuzzy Clustering for Separation of Brain Tissues in MR Images

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, one straightforward way to assess the quality of the registration is to evaluate how the tissues are deformed from one subject to the other, we therefore evaluate the registration quality by computing the overlap between the tissues of the reference image and the tissues of each floating image after registration. The extraction of white matter, gray matter and cerebral spinal fluid is performed using our previous technique (Zhu and Jiang, 2003). In this segmentation algorithm, multicontext fuzzy clustering (MCFC) is proposed for classifying MR data into tissues of white matter, gray matter, and cerebral spinal fluid automatically.…”
Section: Experiments On Datasets Of 14 Subjectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, one straightforward way to assess the quality of the registration is to evaluate how the tissues are deformed from one subject to the other, we therefore evaluate the registration quality by computing the overlap between the tissues of the reference image and the tissues of each floating image after registration. The extraction of white matter, gray matter and cerebral spinal fluid is performed using our previous technique (Zhu and Jiang, 2003). In this segmentation algorithm, multicontext fuzzy clustering (MCFC) is proposed for classifying MR data into tissues of white matter, gray matter, and cerebral spinal fluid automatically.…”
Section: Experiments On Datasets Of 14 Subjectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the main disadvantage of MRF-based methods is that the objective function associated with most nontrivial MRF problems is extremely nonconvex, which makes the corresponding minimization problem very time consuming. We combined a pixon-based image model with a Markov random field (MRF) model under a Bayesian framework [4]. The anisotropic diffusion equation was successfully used to form the pixons in our new pixon scheme.…”
Section: Brain Tissue Segmentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clustering has a long history in the statistical literature and has recent applications in functional neuroimaging, particularly in fMRI. Our analyses focus on the classification of measured brain activity, but cluster analysis is also useful for anatomical segmentation of brain tissues [Zhu and Jiang, 2003]. Neuroimaging applications currently utilize a limited number of existing clustering algorithms, largely selected based on computational facility and speed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%