“…MTDs therefore represent fundamental markers of most of the tectonic events, and the documentation and understanding of their overall architecture, internal fabric, composition, and mechanisms of their downslope deformation and emplacement are relevant for better understanding the characteristics of depositional basins and the evolution of orogenic belts. However, in most orogenic belts and exhumed subduction-accretion complexes, a strong similitude of fabric exists between MTDs with a block-in-matrix fabric (i.e., olistostrome sensu Flores, 1955; sedimentary mélanges, e.g., see Raymond, 1984) and tectonic mélanges (e.g., Hsü, 1974;Raymond, 1984;Cowan, 1985;Bettelli and Panini, 1989;Pini, 1999;Festa et al, 2010Festa et al, , 2013Dilek et al, 2012;Alonso et al, 2015;Balestro et al, 2015b;Platt, 2015;Wakabayashi, 2015). This similitude is the basis of a longlasting debate on the processes of formation of chaotic rock units (i.e., tectonic versus gravitational), and is strongly amplified in metamorphic belts, where polyphase deformation and metamorphic recrystallization to eclogitic conditions commonly rework and obscure the primary internal structure of chaotic rock units.…”