2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2005.01.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anchoring Dental Implant in Tissue-Engineered Bone Using Composite Scaffold: A Preliminary Study in Nude Mouse Model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Also, dental implants were fixed in the newly formed bone and surrounding the implant new bone was formed. On the other hand, no bone formation was observed in the control scaffold [154].…”
Section: Coral-derived Bone Grafts Substitutesmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Also, dental implants were fixed in the newly formed bone and surrounding the implant new bone was formed. On the other hand, no bone formation was observed in the control scaffold [154].…”
Section: Coral-derived Bone Grafts Substitutesmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…In a different approach, Chen et al [154] inserted a titanium dental implant into a coral scaffold seeded with BMSCs and, then, implanted subcutaneously into nude mice back. Defects treated with coral carrying no cells were used as an experimental control.…”
Section: Coral-derived Bone Grafts Substitutesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To study cell adhesion to the materials, the biocompatibility and efficiency for bone growth, MC3T3-E1, an osteoblast-like cell line, was chosen because they are well characterized for modeling endogenous osteoblasts (16). A commercial synthetic scaffold, hydroxyapatite nanopowder (B200 nm) from Sigma Aldrich, was used for comparison.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, coral has been found to be an interesting natural substitute; according to the investigators, ''the tissue-engineered bone of seeded natural coral-implant composite scaffold is promising for dental implant anchoring, which has positive implication for clinical jaw reconstruction'' (15). However, this material is non-renewable, and its use can seriously damage the local environment, both flora and fauna, from whence it is removed (16).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To study cell adhesion to the materials, their biocompatibility and efficiency for bone growth, MC3T3-E1, an osteoblast-like cell line, was chosen because they are well characterised for modelling endogenous osteoblasts [47]. A commercial synthetic scaffold, hydroxyapatite (HA) nanopowder (B200 nm) from Sigma Aldrich, was used for comparison purposes.…”
Section: Preparation Of Renewable Biocompatible Scaffolds For Bone Rementioning
confidence: 99%