2019
DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.aax0061
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ancient DNA sheds light on the genetic origins of early Iron Age Philistines

Abstract: The ancient Mediterranean port city of Ashkelon, identified as “Philistine” during the Iron Age, underwent a marked cultural change between the Late Bronze and the early Iron Age. It has been long debated whether this change was driven by a substantial movement of people, possibly linked to a larger migration of the so-called “Sea Peoples.” Here, we report genome-wide data of 10 Bronze and Iron Age individuals from Ashkelon. We find that the early Iron Age population was genetically distinct due to a European-… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
73
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
(115 reference statements)
0
73
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The role of Sea People may therefore be crucial in explaining a temporary presence of a Minoan-like ancestry in the Levant, bringing Anatolian-like components to levels as high as 85%. A pulse of populations with Anatolian-rich ancestry has just been recently detected in Iron Age Levant, appearing and disappearing from the archaeological record within a range of few centuries 13 . Our results offer a solution to this disappearance, given that their signal may have become erased as a consequence of major warfare after 1000 BCE 14 , bringing these genetic components towards Ethiopia and North Africa.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The role of Sea People may therefore be crucial in explaining a temporary presence of a Minoan-like ancestry in the Levant, bringing Anatolian-like components to levels as high as 85%. A pulse of populations with Anatolian-rich ancestry has just been recently detected in Iron Age Levant, appearing and disappearing from the archaeological record within a range of few centuries 13 . Our results offer a solution to this disappearance, given that their signal may have become erased as a consequence of major warfare after 1000 BCE 14 , bringing these genetic components towards Ethiopia and North Africa.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on previous successes in DNA recovery, the petrous pyramid is currently the most soughtafter skeletal element for aDNA analyses [21][22][23][24][25]40,41 . Our investigation of multiple skeletal elements further confirms the value of the petrous pyramid in the recovery of ancient human DNA (Figure 2A-C).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This observation is based on a collection of comparative PCR 15,[17][18][19][20] and whole genome aDNA surveys [16][17][18] that were, however, limited in the number of individuals and/or skeletal elements tested. Despite the absence of a systematic comparative analysis of preservation across the skeleton, aDNA obtained from the petrous portions of human remains has been utilized to great success in the contexts of both ancient human population genetics [21][22][23][24][25] and forensic investigations 12,24,25 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Last month, for example, the publication of an aDNA study of Bronze and Iron Age populations from the Levantine port city of Ashkelon (Feldman et al . 2019) attracted significant media attention. The results were swiftly critiqued on social media for the framing of the research questions, choice of samples and contextualisation of the results; they were also explicitly politicised through the lens of regional politics (not helped by the emphasis on ‘Philistines’ in the article title, which poorly reflects the contents).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%