1998
DOI: 10.1080/08934219809367681
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Androgyny and rhetorical sensitivity: The connection of gender and communicator style

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Bem asserted that androgynous individuals are able to show flexibility in their behavior and adapt to situations that demand behavior that is stereotypically more appropriate for one sex or the other by displaying behaviors that are masculine, instrumental, and assertive as well as those that are feminine, expressive, and yielding. In addition, androgyny has been linked to a communication style of rhetorical reflection associated with a concern for what is appropriate for a given situation (House, Dallinger, & Kilgallen, 1998).…”
Section: Gender and Leadershipmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bem asserted that androgynous individuals are able to show flexibility in their behavior and adapt to situations that demand behavior that is stereotypically more appropriate for one sex or the other by displaying behaviors that are masculine, instrumental, and assertive as well as those that are feminine, expressive, and yielding. In addition, androgyny has been linked to a communication style of rhetorical reflection associated with a concern for what is appropriate for a given situation (House, Dallinger, & Kilgallen, 1998).…”
Section: Gender and Leadershipmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gender schematic information is a particularly influential aspect of social identity formation (see Bem, 1981Bem, , 1984Bem, , 1993House, Dallinger & Kilgallen, 1998;Yaeger-Dror, 1998). Of particular interest to the current study was the way participants might use language to frame gendered identities within their writing.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Socially endorsed views of feminity and masculinity are taught to individuals through a variety of cultural means. For example, to be masculine is to be strong, ambitious, successful, rational and emotionally controlled (House, Dallinger, & Kilgallen, 1998). To be feminine, on the other hand, is to be physically attractive, deferential, emotionally expressive, nurturing and concerned with people and relationships.…”
Section: Sex Gender and Culturementioning
confidence: 99%