2017
DOI: 10.14361/9783839440117-002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anerkennung und Sichtbarkeit in gegenwärtigen Medienkulturen: Ausgangspunkte

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this approach, the archive is positioned as an object of analysis, shifting the focus on the archive as a site of knowledge retrieval to a site of knowledge production (Foucault, 1972;Stoler, 2002). Instead of examining how sexual minorities as a priori identities are included in the archives, I suggest studying the processes of regulation according to which different lifestyles and experiences become 'acknowledgeable' (Schaffer, 2008;Thomas et al, 2017). Archival practices enacting recognition and regulation include the choice of metadata, the modes of selection for public screenings and online exhibition and the curation and contextualisation of online content.…”
Section: Naming Shaming Framing?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this approach, the archive is positioned as an object of analysis, shifting the focus on the archive as a site of knowledge retrieval to a site of knowledge production (Foucault, 1972;Stoler, 2002). Instead of examining how sexual minorities as a priori identities are included in the archives, I suggest studying the processes of regulation according to which different lifestyles and experiences become 'acknowledgeable' (Schaffer, 2008;Thomas et al, 2017). Archival practices enacting recognition and regulation include the choice of metadata, the modes of selection for public screenings and online exhibition and the curation and contextualisation of online content.…”
Section: Naming Shaming Framing?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this approach, the archive is positioned as an object of analysis, shifting the focus on the archive as a site of knowledge retrieval to a site of knowledge production (Foucault, 1972;Stoler, 2002). Instead of examining how sexual minorities as a priori identities are included in the archives, I suggest studying the processes of regulation according to which different lifestyles and experiences become 'acknowledgeable' (Schaffer, 2008;Thomas et al, 2017). Archival practices enacting recognition and regulation include the choice of metadata, the modes of selection for public screenings and online exhibition and the curation and contextualisation of online content.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%