The Laboratory Rat 2006
DOI: 10.1016/b978-012074903-4/50022-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anesthesia and Analgesia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 125 publications
0
17
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Several studies reported that inhalational anaesthetics suppress CSD 18 19 . In this study, we still considered isoflurane anesthesia, but not pentobarbitone, which has the least action on CSD 20 , for studying genesis and propagation of CSD for the following reasons: (1) our in vivo experiment lasted almost 7 hours, whereas barbiturates usually only maintain anesthesia from several minutes to 4 hours 21 , which did not meet our requirement; (2) Isoflurane has been widely used in other studies for studying CSD 8 16 22 23 ; indeed, isoflurane provided a stable and consistent depth of anesthesia throughout the experiment and the concentration could be adjusted according to surgical and CSD recording procedures under study; whereas barbiturates generally result in uneven levels of anesthesia 21 ; (3) Under isoflurane anaesthesia, the profound inhibitory effects of MK801 on CSD magnitude and susceptibility of the cortex to CSD ( Fig. 1 ) were consistent with those reported previously 24 25 ; (4) The fact that neither genesis nor propagation of CSD was altered in the control group yet was suppressed by NVP-AAM077, suggests that the suppression of CSD was due to NR2A inhibition, rather than to isoflurane.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies reported that inhalational anaesthetics suppress CSD 18 19 . In this study, we still considered isoflurane anesthesia, but not pentobarbitone, which has the least action on CSD 20 , for studying genesis and propagation of CSD for the following reasons: (1) our in vivo experiment lasted almost 7 hours, whereas barbiturates usually only maintain anesthesia from several minutes to 4 hours 21 , which did not meet our requirement; (2) Isoflurane has been widely used in other studies for studying CSD 8 16 22 23 ; indeed, isoflurane provided a stable and consistent depth of anesthesia throughout the experiment and the concentration could be adjusted according to surgical and CSD recording procedures under study; whereas barbiturates generally result in uneven levels of anesthesia 21 ; (3) Under isoflurane anaesthesia, the profound inhibitory effects of MK801 on CSD magnitude and susceptibility of the cortex to CSD ( Fig. 1 ) were consistent with those reported previously 24 25 ; (4) The fact that neither genesis nor propagation of CSD was altered in the control group yet was suppressed by NVP-AAM077, suggests that the suppression of CSD was due to NR2A inhibition, rather than to isoflurane.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the end of the experiment, all rats were anesthetized by a thiopental sodium injection (50 mg/kg) [24] and decapited. The brains were washed in ice-cold saline, and the hippocampus was prepared as 300-μm slices using Vibratome 1000 Plus for the detection of S100β protein [25].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the end of the study, rats were anesthetized with thiopental sodium (50 mg/kg) [23] and killed by decapitation. Blood samples were collected by cardiac puncture, centrifuged at 2000 rpm for 15 min within 30 min of collection and stored at -80°C until assayed.…”
Section: Blood Glucose Determination and Sample Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%