1998
DOI: 10.2307/358951
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anglo-American Feminist Challenges to the Rhetorical Traditions (Virginia Woolf, Mary Daly, Adrienne Rich)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Each field has its own particular agenda and trajectory of development. In the past three decades, moving away from a Eurocentric paradigm, comparatists have sought to identify and use indigenous terms and concepts to study non-Western traditions in their own historical and cultural contexts (e.g., Combs 2006;Garrett 1993;Lipson 2009;Lu 1998Lu , 2004Lyon 2008;Mao 2003Mao , 2007; meanwhile, feminist rhetoricians have employed rereading, recovery, and extrapolation to challenge the gender-biased assumptions about rhetoric embedded in canonical Western theories and recuperate women's contributions to rhetoric (e.g., Bordelon 2007;Campbell 1989;Enoch 2005Enoch , 2008Glenn 1997;Jarratt and Ong 1995;Logan 1999;Mattingly 1998;Mountford 2003;Ratcliffe 1996;Royster 2000;Swearingen 1991Swearingen , 1995. Except for a small number of recent articles that connect comparative rhetoric with feminist historiography, there have been few dialogues between the two fields (e.g., Swearingen 2004;Wang 2009Wang , 2010Wu 2005Wu , 2010.…”
Section: B Wangmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Each field has its own particular agenda and trajectory of development. In the past three decades, moving away from a Eurocentric paradigm, comparatists have sought to identify and use indigenous terms and concepts to study non-Western traditions in their own historical and cultural contexts (e.g., Combs 2006;Garrett 1993;Lipson 2009;Lu 1998Lu , 2004Lyon 2008;Mao 2003Mao , 2007; meanwhile, feminist rhetoricians have employed rereading, recovery, and extrapolation to challenge the gender-biased assumptions about rhetoric embedded in canonical Western theories and recuperate women's contributions to rhetoric (e.g., Bordelon 2007;Campbell 1989;Enoch 2005Enoch , 2008Glenn 1997;Jarratt and Ong 1995;Logan 1999;Mattingly 1998;Mountford 2003;Ratcliffe 1996;Royster 2000;Swearingen 1991Swearingen , 1995. Except for a small number of recent articles that connect comparative rhetoric with feminist historiography, there have been few dialogues between the two fields (e.g., Swearingen 2004;Wang 2009Wang , 2010Wu 2005Wu , 2010.…”
Section: B Wangmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…For discussions of methodological issues in feminist rhetoric and historiography, see Barbara Biesecker (1992), Patricia Bizzell (1992), Karlyn Kohrs Campbell (1993Campbell ( , 2002, Xin Liu Gale (2000), Cheryl Glenn (1997Glenn ( , 2000, Wendy Hesford and Eileen Schell (2008), Susan Jarratt (2000), Roxanne Mountford (1999Mountford ( , 2003, Krista Ratcliffe (1996Ratcliffe ( , 2005, Christine Sutherland (1999), C. Jan Swearingen (1991Swearingen ( , 1995, and Hui Wu (2002Wu ( , 2005. Downloaded by [Tulane University] at 08:41 03 January 2015 4.…”
Section: Rethinking Feminist Rhetoric and Historiographymentioning
confidence: 98%
“…This function of metaphor is evident in Watson's address, which implies Watson's use of metaphor can engender real change for women. Ratcliffe (1996) adds that feminist writer Adrienne Rich stresses the importance of recognizing the imaginative function of language because "if a woman's material existence is to be transformed, her consciousness must be able to break through the rhetoric of patriarchy" (p. 114). Watson's use of metaphor to expose male oppression and illustrate men as victims of gender inequality is the means by which she "breaks through the rhetoric of patriarchy" so feminists can be heard in a primarily masculinist language (Ratcliffe, 1996, p. 114).…”
Section: The Methods Of Metaphor Criticismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This suggests Watson's "new" take on feminism is really the result of an evolution of feminism that is no more radical than the growth between, say, first and second-wave feminism. Ratcliffe (1996) states, "no space exists in which feminists may stand to begin totally anew…but because the dominant discourse is not static, it may be revised" (p. 5). This suggests that though Watson's theory cannot be entirely original, it has the potential to change the dominant discourse from a "masculinist" language, for lack of a better term, to at least a neutral one.…”
Section: The Methods Of Metaphor Criticismmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation