2017
DOI: 10.1515/ang-2017-0001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anglophone World Literatures: Introduction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
2
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…It also contributes to the type of transformative worldmaking that Birgit Neumann and Gabriele Rippl describe, "such as the creation of new, non-Euro-centric geographies and the tentative entanglement of heterogeneous places into networks of reciprocal exchange." 24 The critical reflection that this attention to context requires, moreover, helps our contributors to grow in their own teaching but in ways that are fully supported via a collaborative and communal creation process focused on restoring and inspiring the contributors amidst academia's unrelenting demands. As one of our authors recently told us, "the UVC process took a good idea .…”
Section: Antiracist and Anticolonial Collaborationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It also contributes to the type of transformative worldmaking that Birgit Neumann and Gabriele Rippl describe, "such as the creation of new, non-Euro-centric geographies and the tentative entanglement of heterogeneous places into networks of reciprocal exchange." 24 The critical reflection that this attention to context requires, moreover, helps our contributors to grow in their own teaching but in ways that are fully supported via a collaborative and communal creation process focused on restoring and inspiring the contributors amidst academia's unrelenting demands. As one of our authors recently told us, "the UVC process took a good idea .…”
Section: Antiracist and Anticolonial Collaborationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But the works studied are treated as ideological tools, independent of the system of publishers, critics, prizes, and academies in which they were originally embedded. On the other hand, theories of “world literature” (Buchholz 2017; Casanova 1999, 2005; Moretti 2013) conveniently ignore vast areas of literary history, such as East Asian proletarian literary movements (Cho 2018) or the USSR's “People's Republic of Letters” (Djagalov 2018), and end up offering a very Eurocentric and implicitly normative conception of literature (Friedman 2013; Neuman and Rippl 2017). Only when they can be opposed to dissident authors are authoritarian writers considered part of a literary system, but one in which autonomous actors struggles against heteronomous ones.…”
Section: Autonomy Autonymy Automationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cependant, comme l'a bien remarqué Rosendahl Thomsen (2013), il s'agit moins d'un corpus d'oeuvres aux identités culturelles et nationales différentes, que d'un champ paradigmatique qui ouvre sur des rencontres culturelles et linguistiques par le moyen de la littérature. Cette littérature est avant tout représentée par les auteurs (im)migrants (Boehmer 1995;Rosendahl Thomsen 2013 (Apter 2013;Neumann & Rippl 2017), sans aspérités sur lesquelles ne butterait un lectorat occidental. Cependant, cette littérature visible, promue et légitimée à plusieurs instances du système des lettres, n'est que le sommet de l'iceberg de la littérature qui circule à des échelles variées, sous la surface de la circulation globale.…”
Section: L'iceberg De La World Literatureunclassified