2013
DOI: 10.1007/s10143-013-0471-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Angular craniometry in craniocervical junction malformation

Abstract: The craniometric linear dimensions of the posterior fossa have been relatively well studied, but angular craniometry has been poorly studied and may reveal differences in the several types of craniocervical junction malformation. The objectives of this study were to evaluate craniometric angles compared with normal subjects and elucidate the main angular differences among the types of craniocervical junction malformation and the correlation between craniocervical and cervical angles. Angular craniometries were… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
89
2
4

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(100 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
5
89
2
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The presence of platybasia and a smaller clivus length in the tonsillar herniation can favoring an upper displacement of the cervical spine into the cranial base, explaining the higher incidence of BI in the case compared to control group. Different from our findings, Botelho and Ferreira did not find differences in craniometrical measurements performed in Chiari malformation patients and control groups, but BI patients had wider basal angles and sharper clivus canal angles 17 . Of note, for these authors, BI was diagnosed when the tip of the odontoid was at least 5 mm up the Chamberlain's line, possible excluding patients with less severe forms of BI that also would have the diagnosis of CM.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…The presence of platybasia and a smaller clivus length in the tonsillar herniation can favoring an upper displacement of the cervical spine into the cranial base, explaining the higher incidence of BI in the case compared to control group. Different from our findings, Botelho and Ferreira did not find differences in craniometrical measurements performed in Chiari malformation patients and control groups, but BI patients had wider basal angles and sharper clivus canal angles 17 . Of note, for these authors, BI was diagnosed when the tip of the odontoid was at least 5 mm up the Chamberlain's line, possible excluding patients with less severe forms of BI that also would have the diagnosis of CM.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…Specific measurements for BI will be pointed 5 . After that, relationship between craniocervical junction kyphosis and cervical lordosis angle will be analyzed 5,7 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Basilar invagination (BI) is classically described as a developmental anomaly of the craniovertebral junction in which the odontoid abnormally prolapses into the foramen magnum 3 . BI was recently divided into those associated with craniocervical instability in which odontoid process invaginates inside foramen magnum (Type I Basilar Invagination) and those not associated with instability but with flattened basecranium (Type II Basilar invagination) ( Figure 1) 4,5,6 . Linear and angular craniometric studies helped to clarify pathophysiology of these malformations 5 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations