2017
DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.95.065035
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Angular momentum conservation law in light-front quantum field theory

Abstract: We prove the Lorentz invariance of the angular momentum conservation law and the helicity sum rule for relativistic composite systems in the lightfront formulation. We explicitly show that j 3 , the z-component of the angular momentum remains unchanged under Lorentz transformations generated by the light-front kinematical boost operators. The invariance of j 3 under Lorentz transformations is a feature unique to the front form. Applying the Lorentz invariance of the angular quantum number in the front form, we… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
42
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Only one power of orbital angular momentum L z can appear at a vertex in a renormalizable theory. This leads to new rigorous selection rules for the spin dependence of scattering amplitudes [9]. One also can demonstrate an important property of quantum gravity applied to hadrons: the anomalous gravitomagnetic moment of every LF Fock state of a hadron vanishes at Q 2 = 0 [10].…”
Section: Weak Transition Form Factorsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Only one power of orbital angular momentum L z can appear at a vertex in a renormalizable theory. This leads to new rigorous selection rules for the spin dependence of scattering amplitudes [9]. One also can demonstrate an important property of quantum gravity applied to hadrons: the anomalous gravitomagnetic moment of every LF Fock state of a hadron vanishes at Q 2 = 0 [10].…”
Section: Weak Transition Form Factorsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Writing p ≡ ðp − ; p ⊥ Þ for the three lightfront "spatial" components of momentum, we observe that s ∝ p, similar to the usual (Jacob-Wick) definition of helicity [46], where one would have s ∝ p for the Cartesian vector components. This choice of s μ is exactly that of "lightfront helicity" used in lightfront field theory [41,42,47], where n μ arises through the choice of time direction. Lightfront helicity states have the special property that the helicity, call it σ, is equal to the expectation value of the spin in the z-direction, σ ¼ AE1, in all Lorentz frames, so that we may talk of spin and helicity interchangeably.…”
Section: A Lightfront Helicitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a renormalizable theory 푧 can only change by one unit at any vertex. This leads to a rigorous selection rule for amplitudes at fixed order in pQCD [52]: |Δ 푧 | ≤ in an th order perturbative expansion. This selection rule for the orbital angular momentum can be used to eliminate interaction vertices in QED and QCD and provides an upper bound on the change of orbital angular momentum in scattering processes at any fixed order in perturbation theory.…”
Section: Calculations Using Lf-time-ordered Perturbation Theory and Hmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a renormalizable theory, the change in orbital angular momentum is limited to Δ 푧 = 0, ±1 at each vertex [52].…”
Section: Calculations Using Lf-time-ordered Perturbation Theory and Hmentioning
confidence: 99%