1989
DOI: 10.1016/0009-2614(89)87263-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anharmonic force fields from analytic second derivatives: Method and application to methyl bromide

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
158
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 348 publications
(158 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
158
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All the second derivatives of (distributed) multipoles with respect to amide I coordinate were performed by numerical differentiation (see Ref. 75) with finite difference step of 0.085 Å. Calculations of the first derivatives of total molecular dipole moments were done in GAUSSIAN 09 package from atomic polar tensors (APT) and the second derivatives were obtained by their numerical differentiation assuming Cartesian displacements of 0.006 Å.…”
Section: Distributed Solvatochromic Multipoles From Cumulativementioning
confidence: 99%
“…All the second derivatives of (distributed) multipoles with respect to amide I coordinate were performed by numerical differentiation (see Ref. 75) with finite difference step of 0.085 Å. Calculations of the first derivatives of total molecular dipole moments were done in GAUSSIAN 09 package from atomic polar tensors (APT) and the second derivatives were obtained by their numerical differentiation assuming Cartesian displacements of 0.006 Å.…”
Section: Distributed Solvatochromic Multipoles From Cumulativementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Instead, numerical differentiation of analytic first or second derivatives has commonly been used for the calculation of these quantities. 22,50,51 Furthermore, it has been common practice to evaluate anharmonic contributions at a lower level of theory than the corresponding harmonic force field, 52 which often leads to acceptable results, but is not entirely satisfying from a rigorous point of view.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…64) at the CCSD(T) level with the ANO1 basis set. These calculations are based on an established procedure, 65,66 whereby analytic second derivatives of the energy are numerically differentiated to yield the cubic and quartic constants required by VPT2. 65,66 Finally, residual deficiencies in the quantum chemical treatment of the various electronic states under study were examined at a yet higher level of theory; the coupledcluster singles, doubles, triples, and quadruples approximation (CCSDTQ).…”
Section: Computational Aspectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These calculations are based on an established procedure, 65,66 whereby analytic second derivatives of the energy are numerically differentiated to yield the cubic and quartic constants required by VPT2. 65,66 Finally, residual deficiencies in the quantum chemical treatment of the various electronic states under study were examined at a yet higher level of theory; the coupledcluster singles, doubles, triples, and quadruples approximation (CCSDTQ). With the smaller atomic natural orbital basis (ANO0), both CCSDT and CCSDTQ calculations were carried out for the ground singlet and the various triplet states (the latter with an unrestricted HartreeFock reference) at their respective equilibrium geometries.…”
Section: Computational Aspectsmentioning
confidence: 99%