Animal food products: policy, market and social issues and their influence on demand and supply of meat

Abstract

The present paper aims to contribute to the contentious debate regarding the role of meat as part of a sustainable diet. It uses secondary data to examine the patterns of meat consumption across the globe, and drawing on academic and grey literature, it outlines some of the policy, market and social trends and issues influencing demand and supply of meat. It also presents an overview of the scientific evidence base regarding the pros and cons of meat consumption. The results show that consumption patterns are not homogeneous globally, nor across meat types, with overall meat consumption increasing strongly in developing countries but stagnating in developed countries, and demand for poultry increasing in most regions in contrast to beef. They also illustrate the evolving impact of factors such as income on consumption and the increasing impact of non-economic factors, such as social and policy influences relating to health and the environment, on food choice behaviours, to the extent that such behaviours are increasingly entering a moral space. Given the solid scientific evidence that simultaneously substantiates arguments to increase and decrease meat consumption, it is clear that dietary recommendations need to be context-specific. An important part of the context is the strategies being pursued by researchers and supply chain actors, from farmers through to processors, retailers and food service operators, to improve the sustainability credentials of livestock production. As new evidence emerges from such initiatives, the context will change which means that dietary guidelines will require continuous review.

A slow road from meat dominance to more sustainable diets: An analysis of purchase preferences among Finnish loyalty-card holders

“…The authors declare no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the present work. may consider taste preferences, personal and family health, diet-related environmental issues, animal welfare, religious or other ideologies, and cost [22][23][24][25][26]. The weight of these issues varies by consumers' characteristics.…”

Reducing carbon emissions in aquaculture: Using Carbon Disclosures to identify unbalanced mitigation strategies

“…Furthermore, as international companies with a large market in the EU, Mowi and GSF will need to adhere to EU regulations, such as the upcoming EU Taxonomy. Failure to mitigate emissions may impact future investment and a stabilisation in meat demand in developed markets due to climate conscious consumers (Henchion and Zimmermann, 2021). To support future efforts, further analyses of aquaculture should build on methods here and cover all emissions from cradle to grave to assess a complete GHG footprint.…”

Productivity-Enhancing Technologies. Can Consumer Choices Affect the Environmental Footprint of Beef?

“…The environmental impact of GHG emissions including methane (CH 4 ), nitrous oxide (N 2 O), and carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) associated with beef production is arguably one of the environmental concerns of consumers [57,68]. A consumer survey in Canada revealed that environmental and animal welfare concerns were the primary reasons that 6.4 million Canadians either restricted or eliminated meat from their diet, with the majority of those respondents aged 18 to 36 and possessing graduate degrees [69].…”