2015
DOI: 10.1111/cxo.12312
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Animal models in myopia research

Abstract: Our current understanding of the development of refractive errors, in particular myopia, would be substantially limited had Wiesel and Raviola not discovered by accident that monkeys develop axial myopia as a result of deprivation of form vision. Similarly, if Josh Wallman and colleagues had not found that simple plastic goggles attached to the chicken eye generate large amounts of myopia, the chicken model would perhaps not have become such an important animal model. Contrary to previous assumptions about the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
106
0
4

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 150 publications
(112 citation statements)
references
References 153 publications
(151 reference statements)
2
106
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The use of animal models in myopia research (such as chickens, primates, tree shrews, guinea pigs or mice) allows testing the impact of manipulated visual experience on emmetropization and determination of the underlying mechanisms, as well as the effect of interventions [3]. Additionally, longitudinal studies of myopia development can occur within a much shorter time period than in humans.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of animal models in myopia research (such as chickens, primates, tree shrews, guinea pigs or mice) allows testing the impact of manipulated visual experience on emmetropization and determination of the underlying mechanisms, as well as the effect of interventions [3]. Additionally, longitudinal studies of myopia development can occur within a much shorter time period than in humans.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Diffusers [32][33][34] and negative lenses 35,36 induce large changes in axial length and refractive error (ร€5 to ร€15 diopter [D]) in a matter of days, and results from chick experiments can usually be replicated in mammals and nonhuman primates. 37 Interpretations of results, using mAChR antagonists to prevent FDM in the chick, have generally presumed that these ligands work the same way at avian receptors as they do at human or other mammalian receptors. That said, the chick retinal structure and G-protein receptor sequences differ significantly from those of mammals.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Total natural accommodation in chickens is 15โ€“17 D, as measured by Schaeffel and Howland (1987) using infrared photoretinoscopy and photokeratometry. Accommodation in chicks is estimated to occur at a rate of 80 D/s (Schaeffel and Feldkaemper, 2015), much faster than corresponding human estimates of 10 D/s (Schaeffel et al, 1993). The mechanism of accommodation in the chick has been debated.…”
Section: Basic Anatomy and Physiologymentioning
confidence: 82%