2013
DOI: 10.1111/1365-2478.12032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anisotropic elastic moduli of carbonates and evaporites from the Weyburn‐Midale reservoir and seal rocks

Abstract: A B S T R A C TAssuming Vertical Transverse Isotropy (VTI) symmetry the elastic anisotropy as a function of confining pressure of four carbonates and one evaporite from the Williston sedimentary basin in Saskatchewan, Canada is investigated using the ultrasonic pulse transmission method. Ultrasonic P-and S-wave velocities are obtained from cylindrical plugs cut from a main sample along horizontal, vertical and 45 • orientations with respect to the sample's presumed vertical axis of symmetry. The elastic consta… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
(58 reference statements)
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on these, we assumed that Corvio sandstone is TI, allowing the application of weak anisotropy formulas (Thomsen ). Accordingly, since V p is normally lower in the direction perpendicular to bedding (King ; Martínez and Schmitt ; Thomsen ; Wang ), the direction along the X‐plug (or vector V) would correspond to the symmetry axis, whereas the isotropic plane containing the Y‐ and Z‐plugs axial directions (with velocities about 10% higher) defines the bedding plane (i.e., two perpendicular directions to the anisotropy symmetry axis, i.e., H 1 and H 2 ). Then, taking Thomsen's () notation and equations, it is possible to evaluate the anisotropy for P‐wave velocity ( ε ) and S‐wave velocity ( γ ) from four of the five elastic constants of the material ( C 11 , C 33 , C 44 , and C 66 ) as follows: ε=C11C332C33,γ=C66C442C44,where C 11 = ρV p(H1,2) 2 ; C 33 = ρV p(V) 2 ; C 66 = ρV s(H1,2) 2 ; and C 44 = ρV p ( V ) 2 .…”
Section: Anisotropy Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Based on these, we assumed that Corvio sandstone is TI, allowing the application of weak anisotropy formulas (Thomsen ). Accordingly, since V p is normally lower in the direction perpendicular to bedding (King ; Martínez and Schmitt ; Thomsen ; Wang ), the direction along the X‐plug (or vector V) would correspond to the symmetry axis, whereas the isotropic plane containing the Y‐ and Z‐plugs axial directions (with velocities about 10% higher) defines the bedding plane (i.e., two perpendicular directions to the anisotropy symmetry axis, i.e., H 1 and H 2 ). Then, taking Thomsen's () notation and equations, it is possible to evaluate the anisotropy for P‐wave velocity ( ε ) and S‐wave velocity ( γ ) from four of the five elastic constants of the material ( C 11 , C 33 , C 44 , and C 66 ) as follows: ε=C11C332C33,γ=C66C442C44,where C 11 = ρV p(H1,2) 2 ; C 33 = ρV p(V) 2 ; C 66 = ρV s(H1,2) 2 ; and C 44 = ρV p ( V ) 2 .…”
Section: Anisotropy Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, the low hysteresis observed at the end of the unloading path (∼2%) would suggest that the reduction of anisotropy due to compression is largely controlled by the compliance of equant pores. In this regard, the non‐linear trends are likely indicating that microcrack closing is also playing a role (Martínez and Schmitt ). Nevertheless, our data suggest that all core plugs evolve to a more isotropic state when confining pressure is increased as ε and γ tend to decrease.…”
Section: Anisotropy Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Material parameters from the literature were analyzed to determine if the Rayleigh-wave method would apply to rock. Elastic constants from the literature (Musgrave, 1970;Thomsen, 1986;Christensen, 1989;Martinez and Schmitt, 2013) were used in the Rayleigh-wave method (equations 6-10) to determine a possible Figure 14. Rayleigh velocity as a function of C 13 from equation 9 using the phenolic G10 parameters in Tables 1-3.…”
Section: Applications To Rockmentioning
confidence: 99%