2010
DOI: 10.1190/1.3525359
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anisotropic model building with wells and horizons: Gulf of Mexico case study comparing different approaches

Abstract: Anisotropic depth imaging with ver-tical transversely isotropic (VTI) models has become the dominant practice in the industry. However, anisotropic parameters for these models continue to be derived by basic practices without the use of tomography. Hanging a single profile of Thomsen's parameters from the water bottom still remains the most common practice. In a simple structural setting, it is usually possible to focus the data and obtain a good image despite having a simple and unrealistic model for Thomsen'… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, in complex geologic settings including fold-and-thrust belts and subsalt plays, sedimentary formations are often described by transversely isotropic models with a vertical (VTI) or tilted (TTI) symmetry axis (Douma et al, 2009;Neal et al, 2009;Bakulin et al, 2010a). To ensure stable estimation of the symmetry-direction P-wave velocity V P0 and anisotropy parameters ε and δ, the orientation of the symmetry axis is commonly assumed to be known from structural information (Audebert et al, 2006;Bakulin et al, 2010b).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, in complex geologic settings including fold-and-thrust belts and subsalt plays, sedimentary formations are often described by transversely isotropic models with a vertical (VTI) or tilted (TTI) symmetry axis (Douma et al, 2009;Neal et al, 2009;Bakulin et al, 2010a). To ensure stable estimation of the symmetry-direction P-wave velocity V P0 and anisotropy parameters ε and δ, the orientation of the symmetry axis is commonly assumed to be known from structural information (Audebert et al, 2006;Bakulin et al, 2010b).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Figure 2 we show the location of 18 wells in the Green Canyon (GC) area of the GoM. We are focusing on a study area that was investigated by Bakulin et al (2010b). We also show the corresponding tomographic P-wave velocity cube associated with the subsurface at the region.…”
Section: Gulf Of Mexico Check-shot Data Setmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 2010, the Thomsen parameters ε and δ were estimated at 11 public domain wells by jointly using well and surfaceseismic data in a 1D layer-stripping modeling and inversion scheme. The new calibrated ε and δ profiles were obtained by averaging and smoothing 5 of these 11 profiles in an attempt to remove high-frequency features that could not be accurately propagated in the subsurface over such a large area (Bakulin et al, 2010a). The profiles were then used together with a V P0 field from the second tomography iteration of the old VTI model and a structural framework consisting of the water bottom and two major horizons to construct a TTI model using a multistep process described in details by Zdraveva et al (2010).…”
Section: Large Scale Tti Model Building Using a Geological Framework:mentioning
confidence: 99%