2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2017.08.106
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ankle and Subtalar Joint Kinematics Following Lateral Ligament Repair-Implications for Early Surgical Treatment

Abstract: torque of ATFL. Thus, a patient's inherent laxity or stiffness is likely a meaningful contributor to strength after repair. The CFL fails before the ATFL, potentially indicating its vulnerability immediately following repair. Restoring the CFL likely plays a relevant role in lateral ligament repair, however sufficient time for ligament healing should be allowed before inversion stresses are applied.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Overall, after a combined ATFL-CFL rupture, combined ATFL-CFL reconstruction better restored normal motion than isolated ATFL reconstruction, especially for frontal-plane ROM and AA. This is in contrast with the study of Pereira et al 22 in which no significant differences were found in the kinematics after both isolated and combined ligament reconstruction. However, in Pereira et al's study 22 the cadaveric specimens were subjected to an inversion of 20°, which is more challenging than the normal and trapdoor gait that were investigated in this study.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Overall, after a combined ATFL-CFL rupture, combined ATFL-CFL reconstruction better restored normal motion than isolated ATFL reconstruction, especially for frontal-plane ROM and AA. This is in contrast with the study of Pereira et al 22 in which no significant differences were found in the kinematics after both isolated and combined ligament reconstruction. However, in Pereira et al's study 22 the cadaveric specimens were subjected to an inversion of 20°, which is more challenging than the normal and trapdoor gait that were investigated in this study.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…This is in contrast with the study of Pereira et al 22 in which no significant differences were found in the kinematics after both isolated and combined ligament reconstruction. However, in Pereira et al's study 22 the cadaveric specimens were subjected to an inversion of 20°, which is more challenging than the normal and trapdoor gait that were investigated in this study. Although surgeons think that combined reconstruction may benefit patients, CFL reconstruction surgery is not always considered, given its location underneath the peroneal tendons, close to the sural nerve.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%