2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0026-2714(99)00288-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Annealing effects in the PECVD SiO2 thin films deposited using TEOS, Ar and O2 mixture

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[ 15,20 ] Ar admixture supports fragmentation, oxidation, and deposition of less dense SiOx at moderate ion bombardment conditions. [ 54 ] Such films have a specific density of 1.9 ± 0.1 g cm −3 with a chemical composition of SiO 1.9‐2.0 C 0.4‐0.5 indicating residual hydrocarbons. Note that the CH content does not simply replace O in Si–O–Si by –CH 2 groups.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 15,20 ] Ar admixture supports fragmentation, oxidation, and deposition of less dense SiOx at moderate ion bombardment conditions. [ 54 ] Such films have a specific density of 1.9 ± 0.1 g cm −3 with a chemical composition of SiO 1.9‐2.0 C 0.4‐0.5 indicating residual hydrocarbons. Note that the CH content does not simply replace O in Si–O–Si by –CH 2 groups.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As shown in Figure 1a, the TMS monomer reacted with the oxygen gas, resulting in several additional emission lines other than the transition lines determined from the pure oxygen plasma shown in the inset figure. The emission lines at about 558, 777, and 844 nm were relevant to the transition lines of the oxygen atoms (O) or ions (O 2 + ) [15,16]. The emission lines at about 450, 482, and 518 nm were related to the carbon-containing species of CO [16,17], whereas the emission peak at about 655 nm was assigned as the atomic emission of excited H α [18,19].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2,4,6,9,10,13 The bulk carbon concentration near the thermal oxide/ TEOS interface was primarily a function of the deposited film thickness as shown in Fig. The increasing oxygen diffusivity and interfacial carbon oxidation rate as a function of annealing temperature did not suffice to overcome the combined effect of the higher interfacial carbon concentration and increased film thickness.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%