2010
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkq603
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

ANNOVAR: functional annotation of genetic variants from high-throughput sequencing data

Abstract: High-throughput sequencing platforms are generating massive amounts of genetic variation data for diverse genomes, but it remains a challenge to pinpoint a small subset of functionally important variants. To fill these unmet needs, we developed the ANNOVAR tool to annotate single nucleotide variants (SNVs) and insertions/deletions, such as examining their functional consequence on genes, inferring cytogenetic bands, reporting functional importance scores, finding variants in conserved regions, or identifying v… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

10
9,510
2
25

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11,998 publications
(9,547 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
10
9,510
2
25
Order By: Relevance
“…Targeted gene variants were called by the Unified Genotyper in GATK and also were recalibrated by GATK based on dbSNP137, Mills indels, HapMap, and Omni. Finally, we used ANNOVAR 15 to annotate the variants.…”
Section: Detection Of Single-nucleotide Variants and Insertion/ Deletmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Targeted gene variants were called by the Unified Genotyper in GATK and also were recalibrated by GATK based on dbSNP137, Mills indels, HapMap, and Omni. Finally, we used ANNOVAR 15 to annotate the variants.…”
Section: Detection Of Single-nucleotide Variants and Insertion/ Deletmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reads were mapped to the hg19 human reference using Burrows‐Wheeler Aligner (BWA) 0.6.2‐r12615 and single‐nucleotide variants (SNVs), and insertions and/or deletions (indels) were called using the Genome Analysis Toolkit (GATK) v. 1.6–13 16. After quality filtering steps, variants were annotated using ANNOVAR 17. We prioritized the variants identified in enrolled CP patients as described below (Fig.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Variants were called using three programs: MuTect (SNPs),13 SomaticSniper (SNPs),14 and Strelka (INDELs) 15. Variants were annotated using AnnoVar for functional changes (nonsynonymous mutations) to RefSeq gene annotation 16. For this analysis, mutation detection was restricted to variants identified within coding exons, excluding all noncoding exons and UTRs.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%